Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30975086›Full record

ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2019

An evaluation of whether a gestational weight gain of 5 to 9 kg for obese women optimizes maternal and neonatal health risks.

Abaigeal M Thompson, James A Thompson

Open access · goldAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Predictors of Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes in Pregnant Women Living with Obesity: A Systematic Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Abaigeal M ThompsonSchool of Medicine, University of Texas, Rio Grande Valley, 1201 West University Drive, Edinburg, TX, 78539, USA.
James A ThompsonCollege of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Science, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, 77843-4475, USA. jthompson@cvm.tamu.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3712-1856
Texas A&M University · USThe University of Texas Rio Grande Valley · US

Funding

Estimating and communicating spatial certainty when childhood cancers co-clusterR03CA208021 · NCI · TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY · PI THOMPSON, JAMES A · 2017 to 2019
$149k
National Institutes of Health R03CA208021NCI NIH HHS R03 CA208021
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMaternal obesity has a wide range of health effects on both the pregnant woman and developing fetus. The clinical significance of these disorders, combined with a dramatically increasing prevalence of obesity among pregnant women has precipitated a major health crisis in the United States. The most commonly used recommendations for gestational weight gain were established by the Institute of Medicine (IOM) in 2009 and have become well known and often adopted. The authors of the IOM report acknowledged that the recommended gestational weight gain of 5 to 9 kg for obese women whose body mass index was greater than 30 kg/m

methodsData containing approximately 12,000,000 birth records were obtained from the United States Natality database for the years 2014 to 2016. A Bayesian modeling approach was used to estimate the controlled direct effects of pre-pregnancy body mass index and gestational weight gain.

resultsObese women gaining less than 5 kg during pregnancy had reduced maternal risks for gestational hypertension, eclampsia, induction of labor and Caesarian section. In contrast, maternal gestational weight gain of less than 5 kg was associated with increased risks for multiple adverse neonatal outcomes with macrosomia the exception. Obese women who gained more than 9 kg during pregnancy had increased risk for multiple maternal and neonatal adverse outcomes.

conclusionsObese women who were observed to gain less than 5 kg during gestation had reduced odds of several peripartum disorders. However, this lower gestational weight gain was associated with an increase in multiple risks for the neonate.

Indexed as

Gestational Weight GainAdultBayes TheoremBody Mass IndexCesarean SectionDatabases, FactualFemaleFetal MacrosomiaHumansHypertension, Pregnancy-InducedInfant HealthInfant, NewbornObesityPregnancyPregnancy ComplicationsPregnancy OutcomeAdverse outcomesBody mass indexGestational weight gainMaternalNeonatal

Identifiers

PMID30975086
PMCPMC6460820
OpenAlexW2935813890

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.