Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30975031›Full record

ArticleNeuropsychology, development, and cognition. Section B, Aging, neuropsychology and cognition2020

Older and younger adults' interactions with friends and strangers in an iterated prisoner's dilemma.

Andrew Mienaltowski, Aaron L Wichman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuropsychology, development, and cognition. Section B, Aging, neuropsychology and cognition, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Andrew MienaltowskiDepartment of Psychological Sciences, Western Kentucky University, Bowling Green, Kentucky, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0762-8311
Aaron L WichmanDepartment of Psychological Sciences, Western Kentucky University, Bowling Green, Kentucky, USA.

Funding

RESEARCH TRAINING IN COGNITIVE AGINGT32AG000175 · NIA · GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI DUARTE, AUDREY · 1988 to 2020
$5.6M
EVERYDAY PROBLEM SOLVING IN A SOCIAL CONTEXT AND AGINGR01AG015019 · NIA · GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI HERTZOG, CHRISTOPHER K · 1998 to 2011
$2.4M
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG015019NIA NIH HHS T32 AG000175
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study examined age-related differences in behavioral reactions to interpersonal conflict within an iterated prisoner's dilemma (PD). Participants completed an iterated PD game alone and with a partner, either a stranger or a friend who accompanied them to the session. The partner, however, was actually a program that occasionally behaved selfishly or always reciprocated. Afterwards, participants formed trait impressions of their partner's morality and competence. Participants cooperated more with friends than strangers and more with reciprocating partners than selfish ones. Older adults cooperated more with selfish partners and offered more favorable impressions than did younger adults. Overall, perceived partner trait morality was positively associated with cooperative behavior. Relative to younger adults, older adults were more passive during conflict but grew less so as selfishness continued. This passivity co-occurred with more favorable partner impressions and better objective performance, suggesting a degree of calibration not shown by younger adults.

Indexed as

AgingConflict, PsychologicalCooperative BehaviorPrisoner DilemmaSocial InteractionSocial PerceptionAdultAgedAge FactorsFemaleFriendsHumansMaleMiddle AgedMoralsYoung Adultcooperationeconomic gamesinterpersonal conflictprisoner’s dilemmaSocial cognition

Identifiers

PMID30975031
PMCPMC6790158

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.