Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30975011›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Heart Association2019

Hospital Incidence and In-Hospital Mortality of Surgically and Interventionally Treated Aortic Dissections: Secondary Data Analysis of the Nationwide German Diagnosis-Related Group Statistics From 2006 to 2014.

Benedikt Reutersberg, Michael Salvermoser, Matthias Trenner, Sarah Geisbüsch, Alexander Zimmermann, Hans-Henning Eckstein, Andreas Kuehnl

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Male-Female Differences in Acute Type B Aortic Dissection.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Benedikt Reutersberg1 Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery Munich Aortic Centre Klinikum rechts der Isar Technical University of Munich Munich Germany.
Michael Salvermoser1 Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery Munich Aortic Centre Klinikum rechts der Isar Technical University of Munich Munich Germany.
Matthias Trenner1 Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery Munich Aortic Centre Klinikum rechts der Isar Technical University of Munich Munich Germany.
Sarah Geisbüsch1 Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery Munich Aortic Centre Klinikum rechts der Isar Technical University of Munich Munich Germany.
Alexander Zimmermann1 Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery Munich Aortic Centre Klinikum rechts der Isar Technical University of Munich Munich Germany.
Hans-Henning Eckstein1 Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery Munich Aortic Centre Klinikum rechts der Isar Technical University of Munich Munich Germany.
Andreas Kuehnl1 Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery Munich Aortic Centre Klinikum rechts der Isar Technical University of Munich Munich Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Population-based data about the incidence and mortality of patients with aortic dissections ( ADs ) are sparse. Therefore, the hospital incidence and in-hospital mortality of patients undergoing open or endovascular surgery for type A ADs ( TAADs ) and type B ADs ( TBADs ) in Germany were analyzed on a nationwide basis between 2006 and 2014. Methods and Results A secondary data analysis of the nationwide diagnosis-related group statistics, compiled by the German Federal Statistical Office, was performed for patients who were surgically/interventionally treated for AD ( International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, German Modification [ ICD -10- GM] codes I71.00-I71.07; n=20 533). By using specific procedure codes, a distinction between TAAD (n=14 911/72.6%) and TBAD (n=5622/27.4%) could be made. The standardized hospital incidence of surgically/interventionally treated AD was 2.7/100 000 per year, comprising 2.0/100 000 per year for TAAD and 0.7/100 000 per year for TBAD . The in-hospital mortality of TAAD was 19.5%; and of TBAD, 9.3%. Both the incidence and in-hospital mortality increased over the 9-year period. The share of endovascularly treated TBAD increased steadily during the same time interval. A multilevel multivariable analysis revealed that, for TAAD , age and comorbidity were significantly associated with a higher mortality risk. The latter was also true for TBAD . Sex was not significantly associated with mortality. A significant association between higher annual center volume and mortality was found for TAAD , but not for TBAD . Conclusions This is the first report on hospital incidence and mortality for surgically/interventionally treated AD on a nationwide basis. Overall, in Germany, hospital incidence and mortality of TAAD and TBAD increased over time. In addition, TAAD is performed more safely in high-volume centers.

Indexed as

Hospital MortalityAgedAortic AneurysmAortic DissectionCerebrovascular DisordersComorbidityDiagnosis-Related GroupsDrosophila ProteinsEndovascular ProceduresErythrocyte TransfusionExtracorporeal Membrane OxygenationFemaleGermanyHeart FailureHeart-Lung MachineHospitals, High-VolumeChro protein, DrosophilaDrosophila ProteinsNuclear Matrix-Associated Proteinsaortic dissectionhospital incidencein‐hospital mortalitysecondary data analysistype A aortic dissectiontype B aortic dissection

Identifiers

PMID30975011
PMCPMC6507201

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.