Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30974321›Full record

ArticleCortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior2019

Motor preparation for compensatory reach-to-grasp responses when viewing a wall-mounted safety handle.

David A E Bolton, David M Cole, Blake Butler, Mahmoud Mansour, Garrett Rydalch, Douglas W McDannald, Sarah E Schwartz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

David A E BoltonDepartment of Kinesiology & Health Science, Utah State University, United States. Electronic address: dave.bolton@usu.edu.
David M ColeDepartment of Kinesiology & Health Science, Utah State University, United States; Department of Psychology, Utah State University, United States.
Blake ButlerDepartment of Kinesiology & Health Science, Utah State University, United States.
Mahmoud MansourDepartment of Electrical & Computer Engineering, Utah State University, United States.
Garrett RydalchDepartment of Biology, Utah State University, United States.
Douglas W McDannaldDepartment of Kinesiology & Health Science, Utah State University, United States.
Sarah E SchwartzDepartment of Psychology, Utah State University, United States.

Funding

Before the Fall: Anticipatory Brain Roles in Reactive Balance ControlR21AG061688 · NIA · UTAH STATE UNIVERSITY · PI BOLTON, DAVID A · 2019 to 2020
$366k
NIA NIH HHS R21 AG061688
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The present study explored how motor cortical activity was influenced by visual perception of complex environments that either afforded or obstructed arm and leg reactions in young, healthy adults. Most importantly, we focused on compensatory balance reactions where the arms were required to regain stability following unexpected postural perturbation. Our first question was if motor cortical activity from the hand area automatically corresponds to the visual environment. Affordance-based priming of the motor system was assessed using single-pulse Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) to determine if visual access to a wall-mounted support handle influenced corticospinal excitability. We evaluated if hand actions were automatically facilitated and/or suppressed by viewing an available handle within graspable range. Our second question was if the requirement for rapid movement to recover balance played a role in modulating any affordance effect in the hands. The goal was to disentangle motor demands related to postural threat from the impact of observation alone. For balance trials, a custom-built, lean and release apparatus was used to impose temporally unpredictable postural perturbations. In all balance trials, perturbations were of sufficient magnitude to evoke a compensatory change-in-support response; therefore, any recovery action needed to carefully take into account the affordances and constraints of the perceived environment to prevent a fall. Consistent with our first hypothesis, activity in an intrinsic hand muscle was increased when participants passively viewed a wall-mounted safety handle, in both seated and standing contexts. Contrary to our second hypothesis, this visual priming was absent when perturbations were imposed and the handle was needed to regain balance. Our results reveal that motor set is influenced by simply viewing objects that afford a grasp. We suggest that such preparation may provide an advantage when generating balance recovery actions that require quickly grasping a supportive handle. This priming effect likely competes with other task-dependent influences that regulate cortical motor output. Future studies should expand from limitations inherent with single-pulse TMS alone, to determine if vision of our surrounding world influences motor set in other contexts (e.g., intensified postural threat) and investigate if this priming corresponds to overt behavior.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultElectromyographyEvoked Potentials, MotorFemaleHandHand StrengthHumansMaleMotor CortexMuscle, SkeletalPsychomotor PerformanceTranscranial Magnetic StimulationYoung AdultAffordanceAnticipatory setCorticospinal excitabilityReactive balanceTranscranial magnetic stimulation

Identifiers

PMID30974321
PMCPMC6650316

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.