Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30974317›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in genetics & development2019

Genetic interaction networks in cancer cells.

Barbara Mair, Jason Moffat, Charles Boone, Brenda J Andrews

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in genetics & development, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. High Lethality ofInfection and immunity · 2023
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. CRISPR in cancer biology and therapy.Nature reviews. Cancer · 2022
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Barbara MairDonnelly Centre, University of Toronto, ON, Canada.
Jason MoffatDonnelly Centre, University of Toronto, ON, Canada; Department of Molecular Genetics, University of Toronto, ON, Canada.
Charles BooneDonnelly Centre, University of Toronto, ON, Canada; Department of Molecular Genetics, University of Toronto, ON, Canada.
Brenda J AndrewsDonnelly Centre, University of Toronto, ON, Canada; Department of Molecular Genetics, University of Toronto, ON, Canada. Electronic address: brenda.andrews@utoronto.ca.

Funding

Mapping the reference genetic network of a eukaryotic cellR01HG005853 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO · PI ANDREWS, BRENDA JEAN, BOONE, CHARLES · 2010 to 2025
$7.6M
CIHRNHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG005853
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The genotype-to-phenotype relationship in health and disease is complex and influenced by both an individual's environment and their unique genome. Personal genetic variants can modulate gene function to generate a phenotype either through a single gene effect or through genetic interactions involving two or more genes. The relevance of genetic interactions to disease phenotypes has been particularly clear in cancer research, where an extreme genetic interaction, synthetic lethality, has been exploited as a therapeutic strategy. The obvious benefits of unmasking genetic background-specific vulnerabilities, coupled with the power of systematic genome editing, have fueled efforts to translate genetic interaction mapping from model organisms to human cells. Here, we review recent developments in genetic interaction mapping, with a focus on CRISPR-based genome editing technologies and cancer.

Indexed as

Epistasis, GeneticGenetic Association StudiesCRISPR-Cas SystemsGene EditingGene Regulatory NetworksGenotypeHumansNeoplasmsPhenotype

Identifiers

PMID30974317
PMCPMC6820710

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.