Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30973937›Full record

ArticlePloS one2019

Use of FFPE-derived DNA in next generation sequencing: DNA extraction methods.

Samantha J McDonough, Aditya Bhagwate, Zhifu Sun, Chen Wang, Michael Zschunke, Joshua A Gorman, Karla J Kopp, Julie M Cunningham

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 53 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
53citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

53 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Cell-Free DNA-Based Theranostics for Inflammatory Disorders.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Genetic screening of FFPE breast cancer biopsies for theRevista panamericana de salud publica = Pan American journal of public health · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Comprehensive Diagnosis, Treatment, and Outcome ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Updates in Genetic Testing for Head and Neck Vascular Anomalies.Oral and maxillofacial surgery clinics of North America · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Samantha J McDonoughMedical Genome Facility, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, United States of America.
Aditya BhagwateDepartment of Health Sciences Research, Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, United States of America.
Zhifu SunDepartment of Health Sciences Research, Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, United States of America.
Chen WangDepartment of Health Sciences Research, Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-2638-3081
Michael ZschunkePathology Research Core, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, United States of America.
Joshua A GormanPathology Research Core, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, United States of America.
Karla J KoppPathology Research Core, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, United States of America.
Julie M CunninghamMedical Genome Facility, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-8159-3025

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Archival tissues represent a rich resource for clinical genomic studies, particularly when coupled with comprehensive medical records. Use of these in next generation sequencing (NGS) is a priority. Nine formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) DNA extraction methods were evaluated using twelve FFPE samples of varying tissue types. Quality assessment included total yield, percent dsDNA, fragment analysis and multiplex PCR. After assessment, three tissue types from four FFPE DNA methods were selected for NGS downstream evaluation, targeted and whole exome sequencing. In addition, two low input library protocols were evaluated for WES. Analysis revealed average coverage across the target regions for WES was ~20-30X for all four FFPE DNA extraction methods. For the targeted panels, the highest molecular tag coverage was obtained with the Kingfisher FFPE extraction method. The genotype concordance was 99% for the commonly called variant positions between all four extraction methods with the targeted PCR NGS panel and 96% with WES. Assessing quality of extracted DNA aids in selecting the optimal NGS approach, and the choice of both DNA extraction and library preparation approaches can impact the performance of archival tissue in NGS.

Indexed as

DNAExome SequencingFormaldehydeGene LibraryHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansMultiplex Polymerase Chain ReactionParaffin EmbeddingSpecimen HandlingTissue FixationDNAFormaldehyde

Identifiers

PMID30973937
PMCPMC6459541

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.