Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30973916›Full record

ArticlePloS one2019

Specific expression of MUC21 in micropapillary elements of lung adenocarcinomas - Implications for the progression of EGFR-mutated lung adenocarcinomas.

Mai Matsumura, Koji Okudela, Yu Nakashima, Hideaki Mitsui, Kaori Denda-Nagai, Takehisa Suzuki, Hiromasa Arai, Shigeaki Umeda, Yoko Tateishi, Chihiro Koike and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. MUC21: a new target for tumor treatment.Frontiers in oncology · 2024
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Unique Glycoform-Dependent Monoclonal Antibodies for Mouse Mucin 21.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Mai MatsumuraDepartment of Pathology, Yokohama City University, School of Medicine, Yokohama, Japan.
Koji OkudelaDepartment of Pathology, Yokohama City University, School of Medicine, Yokohama, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-7525-4051
Yu NakashimaDepartment of Pathology, Yokohama City University, School of Medicine, Yokohama, Japan.
Hideaki MitsuiDepartment of Pathology, Yokohama City University, School of Medicine, Yokohama, Japan.
Kaori Denda-NagaiDivision of Glycobiologics, Intractable Disease Research Center, Juntendo University Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Takehisa SuzukiDepartment of Pathology, Yokohama City University, School of Medicine, Yokohama, Japan.
Hiromasa AraiDivision of Surgery, Kanagawa Prefectural Cardiovascular and Respiratory Center Hospital, Yokohama, Japan.
Shigeaki UmedaDepartment of Pathology, Yokohama City University, School of Medicine, Yokohama, Japan.
Yoko TateishiDepartment of Pathology, Yokohama City University, School of Medicine, Yokohama, Japan.
Chihiro KoikeDepartment of Pathology, Yokohama City University, School of Medicine, Yokohama, Japan.
Toshiaki KataokaDepartment of Pathology, Yokohama City University, School of Medicine, Yokohama, Japan.
Tatsuro IrimuraDivision of Glycobiologics, Intractable Disease Research Center, Juntendo University Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Kenichi OhashiDepartment of Pathology, Yokohama City University, School of Medicine, Yokohama, Japan.
Yokohama City University · JPJuntendo University · JPKanagawa Cardiovascular and Respiratory Center · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We investigated the significance of MUC21 in EGFR-mutated lung adenocarcinoma (LADC). Two-hundred forty-one surgically resected LADCs (116 EGFR-mutated and 125 wild-type tumors) were examined for immunohistochemical expression of MUC21 protein. A polyclonal antibody and two monoclonal antibodies (heM21C and heM21D) that bind differentially glycosylated MUC21 epitopes were used, and MUC21 proteins detected by these antibodies were named MUC21P, MUC21C, and MUC21D, respectively. MUC21 mRNA levels were semi-quantified and classified into "high" and "low". Among the immunohistochemical expression detected by three different antibodies, high expressors tended to be related to EGFR mutations. The three varieties of the immunohistochemical expressions were related to different histological elements in the EGFR-mutated LADCs. Either MUC21P or MUC21C high expressors had a higher proportion of lepidic elements with low papillary structure and micropapillary elements. MUC21D high expressors had a significantly higher proportion of micropapillary elements (Mann-Whitney test P ≤0.0001). Furthermore, MUC21D high expressors showed high incidence of lymphatic canal invasion and lymph node metastasis (Pearson x2 test, P = 0.0021, P = 0.0125), and a significantly higher recurrence rate (5-year recurrence-free survival 50.7% vs. 73.8%, log-rank test P = 0.0495). MUC21 proteins with a specific glycosylation status may be involved in the progression of EGFR-mutated LADCs, particularly at the stage where tumors are transforming from pure lepidic to micropapillary through low papillary lepidic lesions.

Indexed as

Adenocarcinoma of LungAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBiomarkers, TumorDisease ProgressionErbB ReceptorsFemaleGlycosylationHumansImmunohistochemistryLung NeoplasmsMaleMembrane GlycoproteinsMiddle AgedMucinsBiomarkers, TumorEGFR protein, humanErbB ReceptorsMembrane GlycoproteinsMUC21 protein, humanMucinsRNA, Messenger

Identifiers

PMID30973916
PMCPMC6459478
OpenAlexW2938371473

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.