Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30973593›Full record

ArticleJAMA ophthalmology2019

Sensitivity and Specificity of Potential Diagnostic Features Detected Using Fundus Photography, Optical Coherence Tomography, and Fluorescein Angiography for Polypoidal Choroidal Vasculopathy.

Voraporn Chaikitmongkol, Jun Kong, Preeyanuch Khunsongkiet, Direk Patikulsila, Mira Sachdeva, Pimploy Chavengsaksongkram, Chutikarn Dejkriengkraikul, Pawara Winaikosol, Janejit Choovuthayakorn, Nawat Watanachai and 3 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA ophthalmology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 63 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Observational
  4. The spectrum of pachychoroid neovasculopathy.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Pachychoroid disease: review and update.Eye (London, England) · 2025
    Review
  11. Imaging in Pachychoroid DiseaseTurkish journal of ophthalmology · 2025
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Voraporn ChaikitmongkolRetina Division, Department of Ophthalmology, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
Jun KongWilmer Eye Institute, Retina Division, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Preeyanuch KhunsongkietRetina Division, Department of Ophthalmology, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
Direk PatikulsilaRetina Division, Department of Ophthalmology, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
Mira SachdevaWilmer Eye Institute, Retina Division, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Pimploy ChavengsaksongkramRetina Division, Department of Ophthalmology, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
Chutikarn DejkriengkraikulDepartment of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
Pawara WinaikosolDepartment of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
Janejit ChoovuthayakornRetina Division, Department of Ophthalmology, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
Nawat WatanachaiRetina Division, Department of Ophthalmology, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
Paradee KunavisarutRetina Division, Department of Ophthalmology, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
Thammasin IngviyaDepartment of Family Medicine and Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Hatyai, Thailand.
Neil M BresslerWilmer Eye Institute, Retina Division, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Chiang Mai University · THJohns Hopkins Medicine · USJohns Hopkins University · USPrince of Songkla University · TH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: The use of indocyanine green angiography (ICGA) is a criterion standard for diagnosing polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy (PCV), an endemic and common cause of vision loss in Asian and African individuals that also presents in white individuals. However, the use of ICGA is expensive, invasive, and not always available at clinical centers. Therefore, knowing the value of certain features detected using fundus photography (FP), optical coherence tomography (OCT), and fluorescein angiography (FA) to diagnose PCV without ICGA could assist ophthalmologists to identify PCV when ICGA is not readily available. Objective: To explore the sensitivity, specificity, and predictive accuracy of potential diagnostic features detected using FP, OCT, and FA in diagnosing PCV without ICGA. Design, Setting, and Participants: Deidentified images of FP alone, OCT alone, and FA alone were graded by 3 retina specialists masked to ICGA findings for potentially diagnostic features of PCV prespecified before grading compared with the criterion standard grading of 2 other retina specialists with access simultaneously to FP, OCT, FA and ICGA. Specialists graded images of 124 eyes of 120 patients presenting between January 1, 2013, and December 31, 2016, with newly identified serous or serosanguinous maculopathy who had undergone FP, OCT, FA, and ICGA before treatment at a large referral eye center in Thailand. Main Outcomes and Measures: Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and predictive accuracy from the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Results: The mean (SD) age of the patients was 57.7 (12.6) years, 52 were women, 68 were men, and the diagnosis (from ICGA) was PCV for 65 eyes (52.4%), central serous chorioretinopathy for 45 eyes (36.3%), and typical neovascular age-related macular degeneration for 12 eyes (9.7%). With the use of FP, a potential diagnostic feature for PCV was notched or hemorrhagic pigment epithelial detachment (AUC, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.70-0.85). With the use of OCT, potential diagnostic features for PCV were pigment epithelial detachment notch (AUC, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.85-0.96), sharply peaked pigment epithelial detachment (AUC, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.80-0.92), and a hyperreflective ring (AUC, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.80-0.92). When at least 2 of these 4 signs were present, the AUC was 0.93 (95% CI, 0.89-0.98), with a sensitivity of 0.95 (95% CI, 0.87-0.99), a specificity of 0.95 (95% CI, 0.82-0.97), a positive predictive value of 0.92 (95% CI, 0.83-0.97), and a negative predictive value of 0.95 (95% CI, 0.86-0.99). Conclusions and Relevance: These data suggest that the potential diagnostic features detected using FP and OCT provide high sensitivity and specificity for a diagnosis of PCV, especially when at least 2 of 4 highly suggestive signs are present.

Indexed as

AgedChoroidChoroidal NeovascularizationDiagnostic Techniques, OphthalmologicalFalse Positive ReactionsFemaleFluorescein AngiographyFundus OculiHumansMaleMiddle AgedPhotographyPolypsPredictive Value of TestsReproducibility of ResultsRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID30973593
PMCPMC6567979
OpenAlexW2939223090

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.