Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30973315›Full record

Trial reportBehavioral medicine (Washington, D.C.)

Delay Discount Rate Moderates a Physical Activity Intervention Testing Immediate Rewards.

Christine B Phillips, Jane C Hurley, Siddhartha S Angadi, Michael Todd, Vincent Berardi, Melbourne F Hovell, Marc A Adams

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Behavioral medicine (Washington, D.C.). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02053259 (Walking Intervention Through Texting Study), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02053259 nacompletednot on this map

Walking Intervention Through Texting Study: A Factorial Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorArizona State UniversityRan2014 to 2018Enrolled96ConditionsPhysical Activity, Behavior, Overweight, Motor ActivityArmsAdaptive Goals, Reinforcement, Static Goals
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. The Genoeconomics of Impulsive Intertemporal Choice: A Critical Review.Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. The Impact of Monetary Incentives on Delay Discounting Within a Year-Long Physical Activity Intervention.Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Christine B PhillipsCollege of Health Solutions, Arizona State University.
Jane C HurleyCollege of Health Solutions, Arizona State University.
Siddhartha S AngadiCollege of Health Solutions, Arizona State University.
Michael ToddCollege of Nursing and Health Innovation, Arizona State University.
Vincent BerardiCrean College of Health and Behavioral Sciences, Chapman University.
Melbourne F HovellCenter for Behavioral Epidemiology and Community Health, San Diego State University.
Marc A AdamsCollege of Health Solutions, Arizona State University.

Funding

WalkIT: Neighborhood walkability and moderation of adaptive walking interventionsR01CA198915 · NCI · ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY-TEMPE CAMPUS · PI ADAMS, MARC A · 2015 to 2019
$2.8M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA198915
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Financial incentives can increase physical activity (PA), but differences in the immediacy of reward delivery and individual differences in delay discount rates (i.e., higher discount values associated with less tolerance for delayed rewards) may explain differential responding. The current study tested whether delay discount rate moderated the relative effectiveness of immediate financial rewards on increasing daily PA. Inactive, overweight adults (ages 18-60, N = 96) were randomized to receive either smaller, immediate goal-contingent rewards or larger, delayed rewards for participation. Delay discount rates were derived for those who completed the Monetary Choice Questionnaire (N = 85). Linear mixed models tested interactions between discount rate and intervention arm on changes in mean daily Fitbit-measured steps from baseline to intervention phases, and rates of change during the intervention phase. Across all groups, participants increased by 2258 steps/day on average from baseline to intervention and declined by 9 steps/day across the 4-month intervention phase. The mean increase in daily steps was greater for immediate reward-arm participants across all discount rates. Descriptive exploration of reward effects by delay discount rate suggested that the magnitude of reward effects decreased at higher discount rates. During the 4-month intervention phase, rates of decline in daily steps were similar in both reward arms, but declines became more pronounced at higher discount rates. Overall, intervention efficacy decreased with less tolerance for delays. The importance of financial reward immediacy for increasing PA appears to increase with greater delay discount rates.

Indexed as

Delay DiscountingExerciseMotivationAdultBehavior TherapyFemaleFitness TrackersHumansMaleMiddle AgedObesityOverweightTime FactorsYoung Adultdelay discountingfinancial incentivesimpulsive behaviorinterventionphysical activityreward schedule

Identifiers

PMID30973315
PMCPMC7830827

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.