Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30973263›Full record

Trial reportJournal of experimental psychology. General2019

Blocking tactile input to one finger using anaesthetic enhances touch perception and learning in other fingers.

Harriet Dempsey-Jones, Andreas C Themistocleous, Davide Carone, Tammy W C Ng, Vanessa Harrar, Tamar R Makin

Open access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of experimental psychology. General, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Does Ipsilateral Remapping Following Hand Loss Impact Motor Control of the Intact Hand?The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Remapping in Cerebral and Cerebellar Cortices Is Not Restricted by Somatotopy.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2019
    Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Harriet Dempsey-JonesInstitute of Cognitive Neuroscience.ORCID 0000-0002-9360-7842
Andreas C ThemistocleousNuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford.ORCID 0000-0002-1089-1543
Davide CaroneAcute Vascular Imaging Centre, Radcliffe Department of Medicine, University of Oxford.
Tammy W C NgDepartment of Anaesthesia, University College Hospital.
Vanessa HarrarVisual Psychophysics and Perception Laboratory, School of Optometry, University of Montreal.
Tamar R MakinInstitute of Cognitive Neuroscience, University College London.ORCID 0000-0002-5816-8979
University of Oxford · GBLaboratoire Psychologie de la Perception · FRUniversity College Hospital · GBUniversity College London · GB

Funding

Royal SocietyWellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Brain plasticity is a key mechanism for learning and recovery. A striking example of plasticity in the adult brain occurs following input loss, for example, following amputation, whereby the deprived zone is "invaded" by new representations. Although it has long been assumed that such reorganization leads to functional benefits for the invading representation, the behavioral evidence is controversial. Here, we investigate whether a temporary period of somatosensory input loss to one finger, induced by anesthetic block, is sufficient to cause improvements in touch perception ("direct" effects of deafferentation). Further, we determine whether this deprivation can improve touch perception by enhancing sensory learning processes, for example, by training ("interactive" effects). Importantly, we explore whether direct and interactive effects of deprivation are dissociable by directly comparing their effects on touch perception. Using psychophysical thresholds, we found brief deprivation alone caused improvements in tactile perception of a finger adjacent to the blocked finger but not to non-neighboring fingers. Two additional groups underwent minimal tactile training to one finger either during anesthetic block of the neighboring finger or a sham block with saline. Deprivation significantly enhanced the effects of tactile perceptual training, causing greater learning transfer compared with sham block. That is, following deafferentation and training, learning gains were seen in fingers normally outside the boundaries of topographic transfer of tactile perceptual learning. Our results demonstrate that sensory deprivation can improve perceptual abilities, both directly and interactively, when combined with sensory learning. This dissociation provides novel opportunities for future clinical interventions to improve sensation. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).

Indexed as

AdultAnestheticsFemaleFingersHumansLearningMalePsychophysicsTouchTouch PerceptionTransfer, PsychologyYoung AdultAnesthetics

Identifiers

PMID30973263
PMCPMC6459089
OpenAlexW2936560970

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.