Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30972959›Full record

ArticleStem cells translational medicine2019

Generation of a Functioning and Self-Renewing Diaphragmatic Muscle Construct.

Caterina Trevisan, Mario Enrique Alvrez Fallas, Edoardo Maghin, Chiara Franzin, Piero Pavan, Paola Caccin, Angela Chiavegato, Eugenia Carraro, Daniele Boso, Francesco Boldrin and 9 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Stem cells translational medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
8.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Tissue-engineered neuromuscular organoids.Communications biology · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Caterina TrevisanFondazione Istituto di Ricerca Pediatrica Città della Speranza, Padova, Italy.
Mario Enrique Alvrez FallasFondazione Istituto di Ricerca Pediatrica Città della Speranza, Padova, Italy.
Edoardo MaghinFondazione Istituto di Ricerca Pediatrica Città della Speranza, Padova, Italy.
Chiara FranzinFondazione Istituto di Ricerca Pediatrica Città della Speranza, Padova, Italy.
Piero PavanFondazione Istituto di Ricerca Pediatrica Città della Speranza, Padova, Italy.
Paola CaccinDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.
Angela ChiavegatoDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.
Eugenia CarraroFondazione Istituto di Ricerca Pediatrica Città della Speranza, Padova, Italy.
Daniele BosoFondazione Istituto di Ricerca Pediatrica Città della Speranza, Padova, Italy.
Francesco BoldrinDepartment of Biology, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.
Federico CaicciDepartment of Biology, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.
Enrica BertinFondazione Istituto di Ricerca Pediatrica Città della Speranza, Padova, Italy.
Luca UrbaniStem Cells & Regenerative Medicine Section, Developmental Biology & Cancer Programme, UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, United Kingdom.
Anna MilanFondazione Istituto di Ricerca Pediatrica Città della Speranza, Padova, Italy.
Carlo BizDepartment of Surgery, Oncology, and Gastroenterology DiSCOG, Orthopaedic Clinic, University of Padova, Padua, Italy.
Lorenza LazzariLaboratory of Regenerative Medicine - Cell Factory, Department of Transfusion Medicine and Hematology, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milano, Italy.
Paolo De CoppiStem Cells & Regenerative Medicine Section, Developmental Biology & Cancer Programme, UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, United Kingdom.
Michela PozzobonFondazione Istituto di Ricerca Pediatrica Città della Speranza, Padova, Italy.
Martina PiccoliFondazione Istituto di Ricerca Pediatrica Città della Speranza, Padova, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-6211-0051
Città della Speranza Foundation · ITUniversity of Padua · ITFondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico · ITGreat Ormond Street Hospital · GBKing's College London · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Surgical repair of large muscular defects requires the use of autologous graft transfer or prosthetic material. Naturally derived matrices are biocompatible materials obtained by tissue decellularization and are commonly used in clinical practice. Despite promising applications described in the literature, the use of acellular matrices to repair large defects has been only partially successful, highlighting the need for more efficient constructs. Scaffold recellularization by means of tissue engineering may improve not only the structure of the matrix, but also its ability to functionally interact with the host. The development of such a complex construct is challenging, due to the complexity of the native organ architecture and the difficulties in recreating the cellular niche with both proliferative and differentiating potential during growth or after damage. In this study, we tested a mouse decellularized diaphragmatic extracellular matrix (ECM) previously described by our group, for the generation of a cellular skeletal muscle construct with functional features. The decellularized matrix was stored using different conditions to mimic the off-the-shelf clinical need. Pediatric human muscle precursors were seeded into the decellularized scaffold, demonstrating proliferation and differentiation capability, giving rise to a functioning three-dimensional skeletal muscle structure. Furthermore, we exposed the engineered construct to cardiotoxin injury and demonstrated its ability to activate a regenerative response in vitro promoting cell self-renewal and a positive ECM remodeling. Functional reconstruction of an engineered skeletal muscle with maintenance of a stem cell pool makes this a promising tool toward future clinical applications in diaphragmatic regeneration. Stem Cells Translational Medicine 2019;8:858&869.

Indexed as

Cell Self RenewalAnimalsCell DifferentiationCells, CulturedDiaphragmExtracellular MatrixHumansMiceMice, Inbred C57BLMyoblastsTissue EngineeringTissue ScaffoldsDecellularized scaffoldDiaphragmExtracellular matrixHuman muscle precursor cellsRecellularization

Identifiers

PMID30972959
PMCPMC6646700
OpenAlexW2939506609

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.