Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30972949›Full record

ArticleMolecular ecology resources2019

Improving Illumina assemblies with Hi-C and long reads: An example with the North African dromedary.

Jean P Elbers, Mark F Rogers, Polina L Perelman, Anastasia A Proskuryakova, Natalia A Serdyukova, Warren E Johnson, Petr Horin, Jukka Corander, David Murphy, Pamela A Burger

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular ecology resources, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 58 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Molecular detection and characterization ofFrontiers in veterinary science · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Structural and functional genomics in Old World camels-where do we stand and where to go.Animal frontiers : the review magazine of animal agriculture · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 6 institutions in 7 countries.

Jean P ElbersDepartment of Integrative Biology and Evolution, Research Institute of Wildlife Ecology, Vetmeduni Vienna, Vienna, Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5593-4447
Mark F RogersIntelligent Systems Laboratory, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Polina L PerelmanInstitute of Molecular and Cellular Biology, SB RAS and Novosibirsk State University, Novosibirsk, Russia.
Anastasia A ProskuryakovaInstitute of Molecular and Cellular Biology, SB RAS and Novosibirsk State University, Novosibirsk, Russia.
Natalia A SerdyukovaInstitute of Molecular and Cellular Biology, SB RAS and Novosibirsk State University, Novosibirsk, Russia.
Warren E JohnsonThe Walter Reed Biosystematics Unit, Smithsonian Institution, Museum Support Center MRC-534, Suitland, Maryland.
Petr HorinDepartment of Animal Genetics, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ceitec VFU, RG Animal Immunogenomics, University of Veterinary and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Brno, Czech Republic.
Jukka CoranderDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
David MurphyBristol Medical School: Translational Health Sciences, Molecular Neuroendocrinology Research Group, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Pamela A BurgerDepartment of Integrative Biology and Evolution, Research Institute of Wildlife Ecology, Vetmeduni Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Novosibirsk State University · RUUniversity of Bristol · GBUniversity of Veterinary Medicine Vienna · ATSmithsonian Institution · USStatistics Finland · FIUniversity of Veterinary Sciences Brno · CZ

Funding

Austrian Science Fund P29623-B25Austrian Science Fund FWF P 29623Leverhulme Trust RPG-2017-287Russian Foundation for Basic Research 17-00-00146Russian Science Foundation 16-14-10009
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Researchers have assembled thousands of eukaryotic genomes using Illumina reads, but traditional mate-pair libraries cannot span all repetitive elements, resulting in highly fragmented assemblies. However, both chromosome conformation capture techniques, such as Hi-C and Dovetail Genomics Chicago libraries and long-read sequencing, such as Pacific Biosciences and Oxford Nanopore, help span and resolve repetitive regions and therefore improve genome assemblies. One important livestock species of arid regions that does not have a high-quality contiguous reference genome is the dromedary (Camelus dromedarius). Draft genomes exist but are highly fragmented, and a high-quality reference genome is needed to understand adaptation to desert environments and artificial selection during domestication. Dromedaries are among the last livestock species to have been domesticated, and together with wild and domestic Bactrian camels, they are the only representatives of the Camelini tribe, which highlights their evolutionary significance. Here we describe our efforts to improve the North African dromedary genome. We used Chicago and Hi-C sequencing libraries from Dovetail Genomics to resolve the order of previously assembled contigs, producing almost chromosome-level scaffolds. Remaining gaps were filled with Pacific Biosciences long reads, and then scaffolds were comparatively mapped to chromosomes. Long reads added 99.32 Mbp to the total length of the new assembly. Dovetail Chicago and Hi-C libraries increased the longest scaffold over 12-fold, from 9.71 Mbp to 124.99 Mbp and the scaffold N50 over 50-fold, from 1.48 Mbp to 75.02 Mbp. We demonstrate that Illumina de novo assemblies can be substantially upgraded by combining chromosome conformation capture and long-read sequencing.

Indexed as

GenomeAnimalsCamelusComputational BiologyDesert ClimateGenomicsSequence Analysis, DNAchromosome conformation capturechromosome mappingdromedarygenome annotationgenome assemblyscaffolding

Identifiers

PMID30972949
PMCPMC6618069
OpenAlexW2937189098

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.