Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30972714›Full record

ArticleTheory in biosciences = Theorie in den Biowissenschaften2019

A stochastic differential game approach toward animal migration.

Hidekazu Yoshioka

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Theory in biosciences = Theorie in den Biowissenschaften, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Gaps in modelling animal migration with evolutionary game theory: infection can favour the loss of migration.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023
    Article
  2. Effects of water currents on fish migration through a Feynman-type path integral approach underTheory in biosciences = Theorie in den Biowissenschaften · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Hidekazu YoshiokaFaculty of Life and Environmental Science, Shimane University, Nishikawatsu-cho, Matsue, 1060, Japan. yoshih@life.shimane-u.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5293-3246

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A stochastic differential game model for animal migration between two habitats under uncertain environment, a new population dynamics model, is formulated. Its novelty is the use of an impulse control formalism to naturally describe migrations with different timings and magnitudes that the conventional models could not handle. Uncertainty of the environment that the population faces with is formulated in the context of the multiplier robust control. The optimal migration strategy to give the maximized minimal profit is found through a Hamilton-Jacobi-Bellman quasi-variational inequality (HJBQVI). A key message from HJBQVI is that its free boundary determines the optimal migration strategy. Solving the HJBQVI is carried out with a specialized stable and convergent finite difference scheme. This paper theoretically suggests that the sub-additivity of the performance index, the index to be optimized through the migration, critically affects the resulting strategy. The computational results with the established scheme are consistent with the theoretical predictions and support importance of the sub-additivity property. Social interaction to reduce the net mortality rate is also quantified, suggesting a linkage between the present and existing population dynamics models.

Indexed as

Animal MigrationGame TheoryStochastic ProcessesAlgorithmsAnimalsComputer SimulationEcosystemInterpersonal RelationsModels, TheoreticalPopulation DynamicsTime FactorsAnimal populationDifferential gameFinite difference schemeSocial interactionStochastic impulse control

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.