Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30972614›Full record

ArticleNeurocritical care2019

Neurostereologic Lesion Volumes and Spreading Depolarizations in Severe Traumatic Brain Injury Patients: A Pilot Study.

Nina Eriksen, Bente Pakkenberg, Egill Rostrup, David O Okonkwo, Bruce Mathern, Lori A Shutter, Anthony J Strong, Johannes Woitzik, Clemens Pahl, Jens P Dreier and 4 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Neurocritical care, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Observational
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 8 institutions in 4 countries.

Nina EriksenResearch Laboratory for Stereology and Neuroscience, Bispebjerg-Frederiksberg Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Bente PakkenbergResearch Laboratory for Stereology and Neuroscience, Bispebjerg-Frederiksberg Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Egill RostrupDepartment of Diagnostics, Glostrup Hospital and Centre for Healthy Aging, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
David O OkonkwoDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Bruce MathernDepartment of Neurosurgery, Medical College of Virginia, Richmond, VA, USA.
Lori A ShutterDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Anthony J StrongDepartment of Clinical Neuroscience, King's College Hospital, London, UK.
Johannes WoitzikDepartment of Neurosurgery, Charité University Medicine, Berlin, Germany.
Clemens PahlDepartment of Clinical Neuroscience, King's College Hospital, London, UK.
Jens P DreierCenter for Stroke Research Berlin, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany.
Peter MartusInstitute for Clinical Epidemiology and Applied Biostatistics, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Martin J LauritzenDepartment of Clinical Neurophysiology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Martin FabriciusDepartment of Neurophysiology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Jed A HartingsDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Cincinnati (UC) College of Medicine, and UC Gardner Neuroscience Institute, Cincinnati, OH, USA. jed.hartings@uc.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8583-3471
University of Copenhagen · DKHumboldt-Universität zu Berlin · DEKing's College Hospital · GBUniversity of Pittsburgh · USFrederiksberg Hospital · DKUniversity of Cincinnati Medical Center · USUniversity of Tübingen · DEVirginia Commonwealth University Medical Center · US

Funding

Bundesministerium f?r Bildung und Forschung BMBF CSB 01 EO 0801Congressionally Directed Medical Research Programs (US) W81XWH-08-2-0016Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft DFG DR 323/5-1FP7 Ideas: European Research Council 602150
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSpreading depolarizations (SDs) occur in 50-60% of patients after surgical treatment of severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) and are independently associated with unfavorable outcomes. Here we performed a pilot study to examine the relationship between SDs and various types of intracranial lesions, progression of parenchymal damage, and outcomes.

methodsIn a multicenter study, fifty patients (76% male; median age 40) were monitored for SD by continuous electrocorticography (ECoG; median duration 79 h) following surgical treatment of severe TBI. Volumes of hemorrhage and parenchymal damage were estimated using unbiased stereologic assessment of preoperative, postoperative, and post-ECoG serial computed tomography (CT) studies. Neurologic outcomes were assessed at 6 months by the Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended.

resultsPreoperative volumes of subdural and subarachnoid hemorrhage, but not parenchymal damage, were significantly associated with the occurrence of SDs (P's < 0.05). Parenchymal damage increased significantly (median 34 ml [Interquartile range (IQR) - 2, 74]) over 7 (5, 8) days from preoperative to post-ECoG CT studies. Patients with and without SDs did not differ in extent of parenchymal damage increase [47 ml (3, 101) vs. 30 ml (- 2, 50), P = 0.27], but those exhibiting the isoelectric subtype of SDs had greater initial parenchymal damage and greater increases than other patients (P's < 0.05). Patients with temporal clusters of SDs (≥ 3 in 2 h; n = 10 patients), which included those with isoelectric SDs, had worse outcomes than those without clusters (P = 0.03), and parenchymal damage expansion also correlated with worse outcomes (P = 0.01). In multivariate regression with imputation, both clusters and lesion expansion were significant outcome predictors.

conclusionsThese results suggest that subarachnoid and subdural blood are important primary injury factors in provoking SDs and that clustered SDs and parenchymal lesion expansion contribute independently to worse patient outcomes. These results warrant future prospective studies using detailed quantification of TBI lesion types to better understand the relationship between anatomic and physiologic measures of secondary injury.

Indexed as

AdultBrain ContusionCortical Spreading DepressionElectrocorticographyFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGlasgow Outcome ScaleHematoma, Subdural, AcuteHumansMaleMiddle AgedPilot ProjectsSeverity of Illness IndexSubarachnoid Hemorrhage, TraumaticTomography, X-Ray ComputedBrain contusionComputed tomography volumeCortical spreading depressionElectroencephalographySubarachnoid hemorrhageSubdural hematoma

Identifiers

PMID30972614
OpenAlexW2939308927

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.