ArticleEuropean child & adolescent psychiatry2019
Caudate volume differences among treatment responders, non-responders and controls in children with obsessive-compulsive disorder.
Article in European child & adolescent psychiatry, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01148316 (Adaptive Treatment Strategies for Children and Adolescents With Psychiatric Disorders in the Context of Public Health), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Adaptive Treatment Strategies for Children and Adolescents With Psychiatric Disorders in the Context of Public Health: "Medicine in Practice"
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Structural neural markers of response to cognitive behavioral therapy in pediatric obsessive-compulsive disorder.Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines · 2020Trial
- Association of Brain Structural Measurements and Polygenic Risk Scores with Obsessive-Compulsive Symptoms in Adolescents Diagnosed with Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder, Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder, Anxiety, Depression, Autism and Tic Disorders.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025Article
- The Longitudinal Relationship Between Brain Morphology and Obsessive-Compulsive Symptoms in Children From the General Population.JAACAP open · 2024Article
- A systematic review of structural neuroimaging markers of psychotherapeutic and pharmacological treatment for obsessive-compulsive disorder.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2024Review
- Psychiatric neuroimaging research in Brazil: historical overview, current challenges, and future opportunities.Revista brasileira de psiquiatria (Sao Paulo, Brazil : 1999) · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Treatment response in obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) is heterogeneous and the neurobiological underpinnings of such variability are unknown. To investigate this issue, we looked for differences in brain structures possibly associated with treatment response in children with OCD. 29 children with OCD (7-17 years) and 28 age-matched controls underwent structural magnetic resonance imaging. Patients then received treatment with fluoxetine or group cognitive-behavioral therapy during 14 weeks, and were classified as treatment responders or non-responders. The caudate nucleus, thalamus and orbitofrontal cortex were selected a priori, according to previous evidence of their association with OCD and its treatment. Gray matter (GM) volume comparisons between responders, non-responders and controls were performed, controlling for total GM volume. 17 patients were classified as responders. Differences among responders, non-responders and controls were found in both caudate nuclei (both p-values = 0.041), but after Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons, these findings were non-significant. However, after excluding the effect of an outlier, findings were significant for the right caudate (p = 0.004). Pairwise comparisons showed larger caudate GM volume in responders versus non-responders and controls, bilaterally. The right caudate accounted for 20.2% of the variance in Y-BOCS changes after treatment in a linear regression model, with a positive correlation (p = 0.016). We present a possible neural substrate for treatment response in pediatric OCD, which is in line with previous evidence regarding the caudate nucleus. Considering the limitations, further research is needed to replicate this finding and elucidate the heterogeneity of treatment response in children with OCD (National Clinical Trials Registration Number: NCT01148316).
Indexed as
Identifiers
30972581What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.