Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30972518›Full record

ArticleJournal of assisted reproduction and genetics2019

Transcriptomic analysis of the interaction of choriocarcinoma spheroids with receptive vs. non-receptive endometrial epithelium cell lines: an in vitro model for human implantation.

Paula Vergaro, Gustavo Tiscornia, Amelia Rodríguez, Josep Santaló, Rita Vassena

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Dysregulated miR-124-3p in endometrial epithelial cells reduces endometrial receptivity by altering polarity and adhesion.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Paula VergaroClínica EUGIN, Travessera de les Corts 322, 08029, Barcelona, Spain.
Gustavo TiscorniaClínica EUGIN, Travessera de les Corts 322, 08029, Barcelona, Spain.
Amelia RodríguezClínica EUGIN, Travessera de les Corts 322, 08029, Barcelona, Spain.
Josep SantalóFacultat de Biociències, Departament de Biologia Cel·lular, de Fisiologia i d'Immunologia, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Rita VassenaClínica EUGIN, Travessera de les Corts 322, 08029, Barcelona, Spain. rvassena@eugin.es.
Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona · ESUniversity of Algarve · PT

Funding

Secretary for Universities and Research of the Ministry of Economy and Knowledge of the Government of Catalonia GENCAT 2015 DI 050
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeSeveral in vitro systems have been reported to model human implantation; however, the molecular dynamics of the trophoblast vs. the epithelial substrate during attachment have not been described. We have established an in vitro model which allowed us to dissect the transcriptional responses of the trophoblast and the receptive vs. non-receptive epithelium after co-culture.

methodsWe established an in vitro system based on co-culture of (a) immortalized cells representing receptive (Ishikawa) or non-receptive (HEC-1-A) endometrial epithelium with (b) spheroids of a trophoblastic cell line (JEG-3) modified to express green fluorescent protein (GFP). After 48 h of co-culture, GFP+ (trophoblast cells) and GFP- cell fractions (receptive or non-receptive epithelial cells) were isolated by fluorescence-activated flow cytometry (FACS) and subjected to RNA-seq profiling and gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA).

resultsCompared to HEC-1-A, the trophoblast challenge to Ishikawa cells differentially regulated the expression of 495 genes, which mainly involved cell adhesion and extracellular matrix (ECM) molecules. GSEA revealed enrichment of pathways related to cell division, cell cycle regulation, and metabolism in the Ishikawa substrate. Comparing the gene expression profile of trophoblast spheroids revealed that 1877 and 323 genes were upregulated or downregulated when co-cultured on Ishikawa substrates (compared to HEC-1-A), respectively. Pathways favorable to development, including tissue remodeling, organogenesis, and angiogenesis, were enhanced in the trophoblast compartment after co-culture of spheroids with receptive epithelium. By contrast, the co-culture with less receptive epithelium enriched pathways mainly related to trophoblast cell proliferation and cell cycle regulation.

conclusionsEndometrial receptivity requires a transcriptional signature that determines the trophoblast response and drives attachment.

Indexed as

TranscriptomeBiomarkersCell DifferentiationCells, CulturedChoriocarcinomaCoculture TechniquesEmbryo ImplantationEndometrial NeoplasmsEndometriumEpithelial CellsFemaleGene Expression ProfilingHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansIn Vitro TechniquesPregnancyBiomarkersAttachmentEndometrial receptivityImplantationTranscriptomics

Identifiers

PMID30972518
PMCPMC6541682
OpenAlexW2936601335

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.