ArticleMolecular genetics and genomics : MGG2019
Transcriptional regulation of the porcine miR-17-92 cluster.
Article in Molecular genetics and genomics : MGG, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Alternative Splicing Isoforms of PorcineGenes · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The miR-17-92 cluster has been involved in the cell cycle, apoptosis, and signaling. However, its transcriptional regulation has not been fully characterized. To elucidate the transcriptional regulation, the promoter of miR-17-92 was analyzed in detail in pig here. We found that, as an intronic miRNA, porcine miR-17-92 cluster was regulated by two independent promoters, an A/T-rich region directly upstream of the miR-17-92 coding sequence, and a G/C-rich region corresponding to the host gene promoter of the human miR-17-92 cluster. Several cis-regulatory elements were identified including sites for c-Myc, NFY, E2F3, and SP1, among which NFY and c-Myc sites were present in both A/T- and G/C-rich regions, while E2F3 and SP1 sites only existed in G/C-rich region. Sites for c-Myc, E2F3, and SP1 were positive for regulating transcription. NFY sites played bipartite roles, functioning as a repressor for the A/T-rich region, and as an activator for the G/C-rich region. Additionally, we found that levels of individual miRNAs in the cluster were not promoted completely in parallel with each other or with pri-miR-17-92 by the A/T-rich region, through using a self-made vector by modifying pGL3-basic in which firefly luciferase gene was replaced with an miR-17-92 cluster and a direct upstream A/T-rich region. The expression regulation of miR-17-92 is complicated and the results will contribute to further revealing the regulatory mechanisms under the expression of the miR-17-92 cluster.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.