Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30972481›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of pediatrics2019

Parental internet search in the field of pediatric orthopedics.

Christian-Dominik Peterlein, Maren Bosch, Nina Timmesfeld, Susanne Fuchs-Winkelmann

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of pediatrics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Dr Google: Which Parents are Performing the Most Online Research Prior to the First Clinic Visit?Journal of the Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Christian-Dominik PeterleinCenter for Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery, University Hospital Giessen and Marburg, Baldingerstraße, 35041, Marburg, Germany. peterlei@med.uni-marburg.de.
Maren BoschCenter for Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery, University Hospital Giessen and Marburg, Baldingerstraße, 35041, Marburg, Germany.
Nina TimmesfeldInstitute of Medical Biometry and Epidemiology, Philipps-University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany.
Susanne Fuchs-WinkelmannCenter for Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery, University Hospital Giessen and Marburg, Baldingerstraße, 35041, Marburg, Germany.
Philipps University of Marburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Parents whose children are affected by systemic diseases, anomalies, deformities, or further orthopedic defective positions use the Internet to increase their knowledge. However, there have been few studies that focus, as this one does, on Internet enquiries done before the parents contact the pediatric orthopedic surgeon. This study analyzed data gathered through a standardized questionnaire on general habits of Internet use, parents' hardware, age, and educational background of the parents. A total of 521 questionnaires were completed for a response rate of 96%. One-quarter of parents (n = 127) attended the consultation because of a gait anomaly or foot deformity, followed by children with DDH (20%, n = 99), clubfoot (9%, n = 47), and scoliosis (6%, n = 29). Parents of children with clubfoot were especially likely to look for health information online (84%, n = 38), followed by parents of children with scoliosis (69%, n = 20), with DDH (67%, n = 66), and with foot deformity/gait anomaly (49%, n = 62). Most people (97%, n = 295) using the Internet for health research purposes made use of a search engine. Concerning use of social media, respondents with clubfoot children were the most numerous (38%, n = 18). There were 35 parents who intended to discuss the results of their Internet research with the pediatric orthopedic surgeon. Most (84%, n = 254) of the respondents who used the Internet for health research planned to do so again.Conclusion: This study documented that the Internet is an important and popular source of information for parents or caregivers in the field of pediatric orthopedics.Level of evidence: Level II; prospective study What is known: •Parents and caregivers often search the Internet for information, particularly before an upcoming operation in the field of orthopedic disorders. What is new: •This study provides recent data on parental Internet research in a large study population.

Indexed as

Consumer Health InformationInformation Seeking BehaviorAdultChildHumansInternetMusculoskeletal DiseasesOrthopedicsParentsPediatricsSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung AdultCerebral palsyClubfootDDHInternetPediatric orthopedicsScoliosisSocial mediaStudy

Identifiers

PMID30972481
OpenAlexW2937913130

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.