Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30972447›Full record

ArticlePsychopharmacology2019

Alterations in effort-related decision-making induced by stimulation of dopamine D

Courtney A Bryce, Stan B Floresco

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Psychopharmacology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Courtney A BryceDepartment of Psychology and Djavad Mowafaghian Centre for Brain Health, University of British Columbia, 2136 West Mall, Vancouver, British Columbia, V6T 1Z4, Canada.
Stan B FlorescoDepartment of Psychology and Djavad Mowafaghian Centre for Brain Health, University of British Columbia, 2136 West Mall, Vancouver, British Columbia, V6T 1Z4, Canada. floresco@psych.ubc.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5633-243X
University of British Columbia · CA

Funding

CIHR MOP 133579
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

rationaleNucleus accumbens (NAc) dopamine (DA) plays an integral role in overcoming effort costs, as blockade of D

objectivesThe current study explored how excessive stimulation of different DA receptors within the NAc core and shell alters effort-related decision-making and compared these effects to those induced by CRF stimulation.

methodsMale Long Evans rats were well-trained on an effort-discounting task wherein they choose between a low-effort/low-reward and a high-effort/high-reward lever where the effort requirement increased over blocks (2-20 presses). Dopamine D

resultsStimulation of D

conclusionsExcessive stimulation of NAc D

Indexed as

AnimalsDecision MakingDopamine AgonistsDopamine AntagonistsLocomotionMaleMicroinjectionsNucleus AccumbensRatsRats, Long-EvansReceptors, Corticotropin-Releasing HormoneReceptors, Dopamine D1Receptors, Dopamine D2Receptors, Dopamine D3RewardDopamine AgonistsDopamine AntagonistsReceptors, Corticotropin-Releasing HormoneReceptors, Dopamine D1Receptors, Dopamine D2Receptors, Dopamine D3Corticotropin-releasing factorD1 receptorsD2 receptorsD3 receptorsDecision-makingDepressionDopamineEffortMotivationNucleus accumbensRatsStress

Identifiers

PMID30972447
OpenAlexW2936488698

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.