ReviewEGEMS (Washington, DC)2019
Collaborating on Data, Science, and Infrastructure: The 20-Year Journey of the Cancer Research Network.
Review in EGEMS (Washington, DC), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Rule-Based Algorithm to Identify Recurrent Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma in Electronic Health Data.JCO clinical cancer informatics · 2026Article
- Recognizing 30 Years of Accomplishments and Envisioning an Innovative Future - The 2024 Annual Conference of the Health Care Systems Research Network.Journal of patient-centered research and reviews · 2024Article
- Incidence and Survival for Patients Diagnosed With Breast, Colorectal, and Lung Cancer in an Integrated System.The Permanente journal · 2023Article
- The US Food and Drug Administration Sentinel System: a national resource for a learning health system.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2022Article
- A History of Health Economics and Healthcare Delivery Research at the National Cancer Institute.Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs · 2022Article
- Infrastructuring an organizational node for a federated research and data network: A case study from a sociotechnical perspective.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2021Article
- Insights from Adopting a Data Commons Approach for Large-scale Observational Cohort Studies: The California Teachers Study.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2020Article
- Trends in Medical Imaging During Pregnancy in the United States and Ontario, Canada, 1996 to 2016.JAMA network open · 2019Article
- Translational Health Disparities Research in a Data-Rich World.Health equity · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The Cancer Research Network (CRN) is a consortium of 12 research groups, each affiliated with a nonprofit integrated health care delivery system, that was first funded in 1998. The overall goal of the CRN is to support and facilitate collaborative cancer research within its component delivery systems. This paper describes the CRN's 20-year experience and evolution. The network combined its members' scientific capabilities and data resources to create an infrastructure that has ultimately supported over 275 projects. Insights about the strengths and limitations of electronic health data for research, approaches to optimizing multidisciplinary collaboration, and the role of a health services research infrastructure to complement traditional clinical trials and large observational datasets are described, along with recommendations for other research consortia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.