Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30972353›Full record

ArticleERJ open research2019

Stopping when knowing: use of snus and nicotine during pregnancy in Scandinavia.

Ina Kreyberg, Karen E S Bains, Kai-H Carlsen, Berit Granum, Hrefna K Gudmundsdóttir, Guttorm Haugen, Gunilla Hedlin, Katarina Hilde, Christine M Jonassen, Live S Nordhagen and 7 more

Erratum issued Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ERJ open research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT02449850 (Preventing Atopic Dermatitis and ALLergies in Children), which is not on this map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02449850 naactive not recruitingnot on this map

Preventing Atopic Dermatitis and ALLergies in Children

TypeinterventionalSponsorOslo University HospitalRan2014 to 2044Enrolled2,701ConditionsAtopic Dermatitis, Food Allergy in Children, Asthma, Rhinitis, AllergicArmsFood intervention, Skin care
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Ina KreybergFaculty of Medicine, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Karen E S BainsFaculty of Medicine, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Kai-H CarlsenFaculty of Medicine, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Berit GranumDept of Toxicology and Risk Assessment, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.
Hrefna K GudmundsdóttirFaculty of Medicine, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Guttorm HaugenFaculty of Medicine, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Gunilla HedlinAstrid Lindgren Children's Hospital, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Katarina HildeFaculty of Medicine, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Christine M JonassenFaculty of Chemistry, Biotechnology and Food Science, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Ås, Norway.
Live S NordhagenFaculty of Medicine, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Björn NordlundAstrid Lindgren Children's Hospital, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Katrine D SjøborgDept of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Østfold Hospital Trust, Kalnes, Norway.
Håvard O SkjervenFaculty of Medicine, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Anne C StaffFaculty of Medicine, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Cilla SöderhällDept of Women's and Children's Health, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.
Riyas M VettukatilFaculty of Medicine, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2152-4933
Karin C Lødrup CarlsenFaculty of Medicine, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In young women, the use of snus increases in parallel with decreasing smoking rates but the  use in pregnancy is unclear. Our aims were to determine the prevalence of snus use, smoking and other nicotine-containing product use during pregnancy, and to identify predictors for snus use in pregnancy. Prevalence was determined for 2528 women in Norway and Sweden based on the Preventing Atopic Dermatitis and ALLergies (PreventADALL) study, a population-based, mother-child birth cohort. Electronic questionnaires were completed in pregnancy week 18 and/or week 34, and potential predictors of snus use were analysed using logistic regression models. Ever use of any snus, tobacco or nicotine-containing products was reported by 35.7% of women, with similar rates of snus use (22.5%) and smoking (22.6%). Overall, 11.3% of women reported any use of nicotine-containing products in pregnancy up to 34 weeks, most often snus alone (6.5%). Most women (87.2%) stopped using snus by week 6 of pregnancy. Snus use in pregnancy was inversely associated with age and positively associated with urban living and personal or maternal history of smoking. While 11.3% of women used snus or other nicotine-containing products at some time, most stopped when recognising their pregnancy. Younger, urban living, previously smoking women were more likely to use snus in pregnancy.

Identifiers

PMID30972353
PMCPMC6452060

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.