Observational studyHawai'i journal of medicine & public health : a journal of Asia Pacific Medicine & Public Health2019
Primary Care Physician Perceptions of Female Pelvic Floor Disorders.
Observational study in Hawai'i journal of medicine & public health : a journal of Asia Pacific Medicine & Public Health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Development of a Maternal Health Care Exercise and Pelvic Abdominal Rehabilitation Curriculum for Obstetric Medical Professionals Using a Modified Delphi Process.International urogynecology journal · 2025Article
- Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) symptom progression and treatment satisfaction from the patients' perspective.BMC women's health · 2025Article
- Primary care providers practice patterns regarding female pelvic floor disorders.Family medicine and community health · 2024Article
- Pelvic organ prolapse: Women's experiences of Accessing Care & Recommendations for improvement.BMC women's health · 2023Article
- Practitioner's knowledge, attitudes, beliefs and practices towards urinary incontinence.The South African journal of physiotherapy · 2023Article
- Pelvic organ prolapse: The lived experience.PloS one · 2022Article
- Maximizing Recovery in the Postpartum Period: A Timeline for Rehabilitation from Pregnancy through Return to Sport.International journal of sports physical therapy · 2022Article
- Exploring literature on knowledge, attitudes, beliefs and practices towards urinary incontinence management: a scoping review.International urogynecology journal · 2021Article
- Postnatal Prolapse Care in the UK: A Qualitative Study.Journal of primary care & community healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Primary care physicians (PCPs) play a major role in patient access to appropriate health care. This study examines PCPs' perceptions and management of female pelvic floor disorders. Surveys were mailed to family medicine and internal medicine physicians associated with the Hawai'i Medical Service Association. A total of 150 respondents were included. Only 34%, 38%, and 9% of respondents correctly identified the prevalence of urinary incontinence (UI), overactive bladder (OAB), and pelvic organ prolapse (POP), respectively. For disease-specific screening, the highest response was that PCPs "sometimes" screen for UI (36%) and OAB (45%) but "hardly ever" screen for POP (43%). With regards to management of UI and OAB, respondents would either treat (30% UI, 39% OAB) or start treatment then refer (53% UI, 49% OAB). For POP, nearly all of respondents (81%) would immediately refer. When consultation is necessary, there was a similar rate of referral to urology and urogynecology for UI (38% urology, 42% urogynecology), and a similar rate of referral to gynecology and urogynecology for POP (47% gynecology, 48% urogynecology). For OAB, PCPs would refer to urology (54.0%), then urogynecology (31%), and lastly gynecology (13%). A majority of respondents were "somewhat familiar" (56%) with urogynecology as a subspecialty, while 27% were "very familiar", 13% were "slightly unfamiliar", and 3% were "very unfamiliar". This study shows that most PCPs are not comfortable managing common urogynecologic problems and would likely benefit from education on how to diagnose, treat, and refer for these conditions in order to optimize patient care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
30972236PMC6452021W2982104317What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.