Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30972138›Full record

ReviewClinical practice and epidemiology in mental health : CP & EMH2019

Virtual Reality-Based Exercise with Exergames as Medicine in Different Contexts: A Short Review.

Marcos Túlio Silva Costa, Lanna Pinheiro Vieira, Elizabete de Oliveira Barbosa, Luciana Mendes Oliveira, Pauline Maillot, César Augusto Ottero Vaghetti, Mauro Giovani Carta, Sérgio Machado, Valeska Gatica-Rojas, Renato Sobral Monteiro-Junior

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical practice and epidemiology in mental health : CP & EMH, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
9.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 101 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Effectiveness of Virtual Reality Systems to Improve the Activities of Daily Life in Older People.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 7 institutions in 4 countries.

Marcos Túlio Silva CostaDepartment of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, State University of Montes Claros, Montes Claros, Brazil.
Lanna Pinheiro VieiraDepartment of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, State University of Montes Claros, Montes Claros, Brazil.
Elizabete de Oliveira BarbosaDepartment of Physical Education, State University of Montes Claros, Montes Claros, Brazil.
Luciana Mendes OliveiraDepartment of Physical Education, State University of Montes Claros, Montes Claros, Brazil.
Pauline MaillotUFR de Sciences et Techniques des Activités Physiques et Sportives de Paris, Université Paris Descartes, Paris, France.
César Augusto Ottero VaghettiFaculty of Physical Education, Universidade Federal de Pelotas, Pelotas, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.
Mauro Giovani CartaDepartament of Public Health, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy.
Sérgio MachadoDepartament of Physical Activity Science, Universidade Salgado de Oliveira, Niterói, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Valeska Gatica-RojasHuman Motor Control Laboratory, Universidad de Talca, Talca, Chile.
Renato Sobral Monteiro-JuniorDepartment of Physical Education, State University of Montes Claros, Montes Claros, Brazil.
Universidade Estadual de Montes Claros · BRComplexité, Innovation et Activités Motrices et Sportives · FRUniversidade Federal de Pelotas · BRUniversidade Federal Fluminense · BRUniversidade Salgado de Oliveira · BRUniversity of Cagliari · ITUniversity of Talca · CL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is enough evidence that, nowadays, the sedentary lifestyle is one of the major health problems worldwide, linked to many chronic diseases, including mental comorbidities, systemic hypertension, metabolic dysregulation, and cancer. Although health societies recommend engagement to physical activities, there is an overwhelming number of people remaining sedentary, even knowing the health benefits of regular exercises. One of the main factors that justifies this scenario is the lack of motivation, which is a barrier to people intended to start new habits for health. Considering this previous information, new alternatives for exercises may help people engage in a healthier lifestyle. Technology has contributed to this with devices that allow movements based on virtual reality approaches, including the exergames. These are games available even in commercial devices, as video-games, that allow people to work with different physical components. Furthermore, exergames add cognitive gain through its dual-task characteristic. Moreover, due to the combination of these benefits, they are feasible to acquire, and easy to use. Exergames are not only a potential strategy to reduce sedentary lifestyle but also a good method to improve health gains and rehabilitation in different populations and pathological conditions: older adults, stroke survivors, and Parkinson's disease. In this review, we aim to demonstrate some conditions that literature supports the intervention with exergames due to its physical and cognitive benefits. Furthermore, at the end of this review, we also explore the neurobiological mechanisms behind virtual-reality based exercises.

Indexed as

BalanceCognitionExergamesHealth promotionMotor-functionNeurobiologyNeurologic diseasesVirtual-reality

Identifiers

PMID30972138
PMCPMC6407662
OpenAlexW2914482064

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.