Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30972088›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2019

Ecosystem Services Related to Carbon Cycling - Modeling Present and Future Impacts in Boreal Forests.

Maria Holmberg, Tuula Aalto, Anu Akujärvi, Ali Nadir Arslan, Irina Bergström, Kristin Böttcher, Ismo Lahtinen, Annikki Mäkelä, Tiina Markkanen, Francesco Minunno and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Maria HolmbergFinnish Environment Institute (SYKE), Helsinki, Finland.
Tuula AaltoFinnish Meteorological Institute (FMI), Helsinki, Finland.
Anu AkujärviFinnish Environment Institute (SYKE), Helsinki, Finland.
Ali Nadir ArslanFinnish Meteorological Institute (FMI), Helsinki, Finland.
Irina BergströmFinnish Environment Institute (SYKE), Helsinki, Finland.
Kristin BöttcherFinnish Environment Institute (SYKE), Helsinki, Finland.
Ismo LahtinenFinnish Environment Institute (SYKE), Helsinki, Finland.
Annikki MäkeläDepartment of Forest Sciences, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Tiina MarkkanenFinnish Meteorological Institute (FMI), Helsinki, Finland.
Francesco MinunnoDepartment of Forest Sciences, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Mikko PeltoniemiNational Resources Institute (LUKE), Helsinki, Finland.
Katri RankinenFinnish Environment Institute (SYKE), Helsinki, Finland.
Petteri VihervaaraFinnish Environment Institute (SYKE), Helsinki, Finland.
Martin ForsiusFinnish Environment Institute (SYKE), Helsinki, Finland.
Finnish Environment Institute · FIFinnish Meteorological Institute · FIUniversity of Helsinki · FINatural Resources Institute Finland · FI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Forests regulate climate, as carbon, water and nutrient fluxes are modified by physiological processes of vegetation and soil. Forests also provide renewable raw material, food, and recreational possibilities. Rapid climate warming projected for the boreal zone may change the provision of these ecosystem services. We demonstrate model based estimates of present and future ecosystem services related to carbon cycling of boreal forests. The services were derived from biophysical variables calculated by two dynamic models. Future changes in the biophysical variables were driven by climate change scenarios obtained as results of a sample of global climate models downscaled for Finland, assuming three future pathways of radiative forcing. We introduce continuous monitoring on phenology to be used in model parametrization through a webcam network with automated image processing features. In our analysis, climate change impacts on key boreal forest ecosystem services are both beneficial and detrimental. Our results indicate an increase in annual forest growth of about 60% and an increase in annual carbon sink of roughly 40% from the reference period (1981-2010) to the end of the century. The vegetation active period was projected to start about 3 weeks earlier and end ten days later by the end of the century compared to currently. We found a risk for increasing drought, and a decrease in the number of soil frost days. Our results show a considerable uncertainty in future provision of boreal forest ecosystem services.

Indexed as

carbon sinkcontinuous monitoringforest growthJSBACHmodelPREBASvegetation active periodwebcam

Identifiers

PMID30972088
PMCPMC6443878
OpenAlexW2924739935

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.