Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30972032›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2019

Spatial Variability of Antarctic Surface Snow Bacterial Communities.

Lucie A Malard, Marie Šabacká, Iordanis Magiopoulos, Matt Mowlem, Andy Hodson, Martyn Tranter, Martin J Siegert, David A Pearce

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Disentangling bacterial diversity and biogeography in snow-covered regions.World journal of microbiology & biotechnology · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Comparative analysis of bacterial diversity in accumulated snow and exposed sediments across Antarctic Islands.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Spatial and temporal conversion of nitrogen usingFrontiers in microbiology · 2023
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Lucie A MalardDepartment of Applied Sciences, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, Northumbria University at Newcastle, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom.
Marie ŠabackáCentre for Polar Ecology, University of South Bohemia in České Budějovice, České Budějovice, Czechia.
Iordanis MagiopoulosInstitute of Oceanography, Hellenic Centre for Marine Research, Heraklion, Greece.
Matt MowlemOcean Technology and Engineering Group, National Oceanography Centre Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.
Andy HodsonArctic Geology, University Centre in Svalbard, Longyearbyen, Norway.
Martyn TranterBristol Glaciology Centre, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.
Martin J SiegertGrantham Institute, Department of Earth Science and Engineering, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
David A PearceDepartment of Applied Sciences, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, Northumbria University at Newcastle, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It was once a long-held view that the Antarctic was a pristine environment with low biomass, low biodiversity and low rates of microbial activity. However, as the intensity of scientific investigation has increased, so these views have started to change. In particular, the role and impact of human activity toward indigenous microbial communities has started to come under more intense scrutiny. During the Subglacial Lake Ellsworth exploration campaign in December 2012, a microbiological survey was conducted to determine the extent and likelihood of exogenous input into the subglacial lake system during the hot-water drilling process. Snow was collected from the surface to represent that used for melt water production for hot-water drilling. The results of this study showed that snow used to provide melt water differed in its microbiological composition from that of the surrounding area and raised the question of how the biogeography of snow-borne microorganisms might influence the potential outcome of scientific analyses. In this study, we investigated the biogeography of microorganisms in snow around a series of Antarctic logistic hubs, where human activity was clearly apparent, and from which scientific investigations have been undertaken. A change in microbial community structure with geographical location was apparent and, notably, a decrease in alpha diversity at more remote southern latitudes. Soil-related microorganisms dominated microbial assemblages suggesting terrestrial input, most likely from long-range aeolian transport into continental Antarctica. We also observed that relic DNA was not a major issue when assessing snow samples. Overall, our observations might have profound implications for future scientific activities in Antarctica, such as the need to establish "no-go" protected areas, the need for better characterization of field sites and improved protocols for sterilization and verification of ice drilling equipment.

Indexed as

AntarcticbiogeographyEllsworth Lakemicrobial diversityrelic DNAsnow

Identifiers

PMID30972032
PMCPMC6443967

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.