Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30971794›Full record

ArticleNature human behaviour2019

The primacy of categories in the recognition of 12 emotions in speech prosody across two cultures.

Alan S Cowen, Petri Laukka, Hillary Anger Elfenbein, Runjing Liu, Dacher Keltner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature human behaviour, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. The expression of awe: evolutionary origins and cultural elaborations of a basic emotion.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2026
    Review
  4. Brain Mechanisms of Lexicality in Bilingual Emotion Processing.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. The Sound of Emotional Prosody: Nearly 3 Decades of Research and Future Directions.Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science · 2025
    Article
  10. Structure in conversation: Evidence for the vocabulary, semantics, and syntax of prosody.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Alan S CowenDepartment of Psychology, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA. alan.cowen@berkeley.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8381-5883
Petri LaukkaDepartment of Psychology, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8771-6818
Hillary Anger ElfenbeinOlin School of Business, Washington University, Saint Louis, MO, USA.
Runjing LiuDepartment of Statistics, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA.
Dacher KeltnerDepartment of Psychology, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA.

Funding

PREDOCTORAL TRAINING CONSORTIUM IN AFFECTIVE SCIENCET32MH020006 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI GROSS, JAMES J, JOHNSON, SHERI L · 1998 to 2018
$5.9M
NIMH NIH HHS T32 MH020006
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Central to emotion science is the degree to which categories, such as Awe, or broader affective features, such as Valence, underlie the recognition of emotional expression. To explore the processes by which people recognize emotion from prosody, US and Indian participants were asked to judge the emotion categories or affective features communicated by 2,519 speech samples produced by 100 actors from 5 cultures. With large-scale statistical inference methods, we find that prosody can communicate at least 12 distinct kinds of emotion that are preserved across the 2 cultures. Analyses of the semantic and acoustic structure of the recognition of emotions reveal that emotion categories drive the recognition of emotions more so than affective features, including Valence. In contrast to discrete emotion theories, however, emotion categories are bridged by gradients representing blends of emotions. Our findings, visualized within an interactive map, reveal a complex, high-dimensional space of emotional states recognized cross-culturally in speech prosody.

Indexed as

EmotionsPsycholinguisticsRecognition, PsychologySocial PerceptionSpeech PerceptionAdultCross-Cultural ComparisonFemaleHumansIndiaMaleSemanticsSpeech AcousticsUnited States

Identifiers

PMID30971794
PMCPMC6687085

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.