Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30971733›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2019

Deposition of lignin in four species of Saccharum.

Juan Pablo Portilla Llerena, Raquel Figueiredo, Michael Dos Santos Brito, Eduardo Kiyota, Juliana Lischka Sampaio Mayer, Pedro Araujo, Flavia Camila Schimpl, Murali Dama, Markus Pauly, Paulo Mazzafera

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. GM crops & food · 2024
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Visualization of Suberization and Lignification in Sugarcane.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2022
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Juan Pablo Portilla LlerenaDepartamento de Biologia Vegetal, Instituto de Biologia, CP 6109, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Campinas, SP, 13083-970, Brazil.
Raquel FigueiredoDepartamento de Biologia Vegetal, Instituto de Biologia, CP 6109, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Campinas, SP, 13083-970, Brazil.
Michael Dos Santos BritoInstituto de Ciência e Tecnologia, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, Campus São José dos Campos, São José dos Campos, SP, 12231-280, Brazil.
Eduardo KiyotaDepartamento de Biologia Vegetal, Instituto de Biologia, CP 6109, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Campinas, SP, 13083-970, Brazil.
Juliana Lischka Sampaio MayerDepartamento de Biologia Vegetal, Instituto de Biologia, CP 6109, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Campinas, SP, 13083-970, Brazil.
Pedro AraujoDepartamento de Genética Evolução e Bioagentes, Instituto de Biologia, CP 6109, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Campinas, SP, 13083-970, Brazil.
Flavia Camila SchimplDepartamento de Biologia Vegetal, Instituto de Biologia, CP 6109, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Campinas, SP, 13083-970, Brazil.
Murali DamaHeinrich Heine University, Institute for Plant Cell Biology and Biotechnology, D-40225, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Markus PaulyHeinrich Heine University, Institute for Plant Cell Biology and Biotechnology, D-40225, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Paulo MazzaferaDepartamento de Biologia Vegetal, Instituto de Biologia, CP 6109, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Campinas, SP, 13083-970, Brazil. pmazza@unicamp.br.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9073-4056
Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) · BRHeinrich Heine University Düsseldorf · DEUniversidade de São Paulo · BRUniversidade Federal de São Paulo · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We used primers designed on conserved gene regions of several species to isolate the most expressed genes of the lignin pathway in four Saccharum species. S. officinarum and S. barberi have more sucrose in the culms than S. spontaneum and S. robustum, but less polysaccharides and lignin in the cell wall. S. spontaneum, and S. robustum had the lowest S/G ratio and a lower rate of saccharification in mature internodes. Surprisingly, except for CAD, 4CL, and CCoAOMT for which we found three, two, and two genes, respectively, only one gene was found for the other enzymes and their sequences were highly similar among the species. S. spontaneum had the highest expression for most genes. CCR and CCoAOMT B presented the highest expression; 4CL and F5H showed increased expression in mature tissues; C3H and CCR had higher expression in S. spontaneum, and one of the CADs isolated (CAD B) had higher expression in S. officinarum. The similarity among the most expressed genes isolated from these species was unexpected and indicated that lignin biosynthesis is conserved in Saccharum including commercial varieties Thus the lignin biosynthesis control in sugarcane may be only fully understood with the knowledge of the promotor region of each gene.

Indexed as

Cell WallGene Expression Regulation, PlantLigninPhenolsPhylogenyPlant ProteinsPolysaccharidesPromoter Regions, GeneticSaccharumSpecies SpecificityLigninPhenolsPlant ProteinsPolysaccharides

Identifiers

PMID30971733
PMCPMC6458172
OpenAlexW2938591191

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.