Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30971592›Full record

ReviewAnnals of cardiac anaesthesia

A complete review of preclinical and clinical uses of the noble gas argon: Evidence of safety and protection.

Francesca Nespoli, Simone Redaelli, Laura Ruggeri, Francesca Fumagalli, Davide Olivari, Giuseppe Ristagno

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annals of cardiac anaesthesia. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. CardioPulmonary resuscitation withResuscitation plus · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Argon cold atmospheric plasma eradicates pathogensFrontiers in veterinary science · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Argon Attenuates Multiorgan Failure in Relation with HMGB1 Inhibition.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Argon: The Future Organ Protectant?Annals of cardiac anaesthesia
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Francesca NespoliDepartment of Cardiovascular Research, Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
Simone RedaelliDepartment of Cardiovascular Research, Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
Laura RuggeriDepartment of Cardiovascular Research, Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
Francesca FumagalliDepartment of Cardiovascular Research, Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
Davide OlivariDepartment of Cardiovascular Research, Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
Giuseppe RistagnoDepartment of Cardiovascular Research, Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri IRCCS, Milan, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The noble gas argon (Ar) is a "biologically" active element and has been extensively studied preclinically for its organ protection properties. This work reviews all preclinical studies employing Ar and describes the clinical uses reported in literature, analyzing 55 pertinent articles found by means of a search on PubMed and Embase. Ventilation with Ar has been tested in different models of acute disease at concentrations ranging from 20% to 80% and for durations between a few minutes up to days. Overall, lesser cell death, smaller infarct size, and better functional recovery after ischemia have been repeatedly observed. Modulation of the molecular pathways involved in cell survival, with resulting anti-apoptotic and pro-survival effects, appeared as the determinant mechanism by which Ar fulfills its protective role. These beneficial effects have been reported regardless of onset and duration of Ar exposure, especially after cardiac arrest. In addition, ventilation with Ar was safe both in animals and humans. Thus, preclinical and clinical data support future clinical studies on the role of inhalatory Ar as an organ protector.

Indexed as

AnimalsArgonBrain InjuriesDisease Models, AnimalHeart ArrestHumansNeuroprotective AgentsRatsReperfusion InjuryArgonNeuroprotective AgentsArgoncardiac arrestischemia-reperfusion injuryneuroprotection

Identifiers

PMID30971592
PMCPMC6489383

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.