Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30971492›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2019

Conserved serum protein biomarkers associated with growing early colorectal adenomas.

Melanie M Ivancic, Leigh W Anson, Perry J Pickhardt, Bryant Megna, Bryan D Pooler, Linda Clipson, Mark Reichelderfer, Michael R Sussman, William F Dove

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. LRG1: an emerging player in disease pathogenesis.Journal of biomedical science · 2022
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Melanie M IvancicBiotechnology Center, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53706; ivancic@wisc.edu ppickhardt2@uwhealth.org mxr@medicine.wisc.edu msussman@wisc.edu dove@oncology.wisc.edu.
Leigh W AnsonBiotechnology Center, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53706.
Perry J PickhardtDepartment of Radiology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI 53792; ivancic@wisc.edu ppickhardt2@uwhealth.org mxr@medicine.wisc.edu msussman@wisc.edu dove@oncology.wisc.edu.
Bryant MegnaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI 53705.
Bryan D PoolerDepartment of Radiology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI 53792.
Linda ClipsonMcArdle Laboratory for Cancer Research, Department of Oncology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI 53705.
Mark ReichelderferDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI 53705; ivancic@wisc.edu ppickhardt2@uwhealth.org mxr@medicine.wisc.edu msussman@wisc.edu dove@oncology.wisc.edu.
Michael R SussmanBiotechnology Center, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53706; ivancic@wisc.edu ppickhardt2@uwhealth.org mxr@medicine.wisc.edu msussman@wisc.edu dove@oncology.wisc.edu.
William F DoveMcArdle Laboratory for Cancer Research, Department of Oncology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI 53705; ivancic@wisc.edu ppickhardt2@uwhealth.org mxr@medicine.wisc.edu msussman@wisc.edu dove@oncology.wisc.edu.
University of Wisconsin–Madison · US

Funding

UW COMPREHENSIVE CANCER CENTER SUPPORTP30CA014520 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI Christian Capitini · 1985 to 2026
$142.6M
University of Wisconsin Institute for Clinical and Translational ResearchUL1TR002373 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI ELIZABETH S BURNSIDE, Allan R. Brasier · 2017 to 2026
$75.9M
BIOTECHNOLOGY TRAINING PROGRAMT32GM008349 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI FOX, BRIAN G · 1989 to 2019
$22.5M
GENES CONTROLLING NEOPLASIA OF THE INTESTINAL EPITHELIUMR37CA063677 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI DOVE, WILLIAM FRANKLIN · 1998 to 2008
$6.3M
Comparative Effectiveness of Virtual and Optical Colonoscopy for CRC SurveillanceR01CA155347 · NCI · RESEARCH INST OF FOX CHASE CAN CTR · PI WEINBERG, DAVID S · 2011 to 2015
$3.3M
Virtual Colonoscopy and Colorectal Cancer ScreeningR01CA144835 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI PICKHARDT, PERRY, SMITH, MAUREEN A · 2010 to 2013
$2.1M
The Role of Aryl Hyrocarbon Receptor in Colon TumorigenesisR01ES020900 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI KENNEDY, GREGORY DEAN · 2013 to 2017
$1.6M
Molecular and Cellular Mechanisms of Tumor DevelopmentT32CA157322 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI ALEXANDER, CAROLINE M · 2011 to 2017
$1.6M
CELL CYCLE, DEVELOPMENT, AND NEOPLASIAR01CA063677 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI DOVE, WILLIAM FRANKLIN · 1993 to 2012
$1.4M
Ultra-Low Radiation Dose Body CT ImagingR01CA169331 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI CHEN, GUANG-HONG, PICKHARDT, PERRY · 2012 to 2016
$1.4M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002373NCI NIH HHS P30 CA014520NCI NIH HHS R01 CA063677NCI NIH HHS R01 CA144835NCI NIH HHS R01 CA155347NCI NIH HHS R01 CA169331NCI NIH HHS R37 CA063677NCI NIH HHS T32 CA157322NIEHS NIH HHS R01 ES020900NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM008349
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A major challenge for the reduction of colon cancer is to detect patients carrying high-risk premalignant adenomas with minimally invasive testing. As one step, we have addressed the feasibility of detecting protein signals in the serum of patients carrying an adenoma as small as 6-9 mm in maximum linear dimension. Serum protein biomarkers, discovered in two animal models of early colonic adenomagenesis, were studied in patients using quantitative mass-spectrometric assays. One cohort included patients bearing adenomas known to be growing on the basis of longitudinal computed tomographic colonography. The other cohort, screened by optical colonoscopy, included both patients free of adenomas and patients bearing adenomas whose risk status was judged by histopathology. The markers F5, ITIH4, LRG1, and VTN were each elevated both in this patient study and in the studies of the Pirc rat model. The quantitative study in the Pirc rat model had demonstrated that the elevated level of each of these markers is correlated with the number of colonic adenomas. However, the levels of these markers in patients were not significantly correlated with the total adenoma volume. Postpolypectomy blood samples demonstrated that the elevated levels of these four conserved markers persisted after polypectomy. Two additional serum markers rapidly renormalized after polypectomy: growth-associated CRP levels were enhanced only with high-risk adenomas, while PI16 levels, not associated with growth, were reduced regardless of risk status. We discuss biological hypotheses to account for these observations, and ways for these signals to contribute to the prevention of colon cancer.

Indexed as

AdenomaColorectal NeoplasmsAgedAnimalsBiomarkers, TumorColonography, Computed TomographicFemaleHumansMaleMass SpectrometryMiddle AgedNeoplasms, ExperimentalRatsROC CurveBiomarkers, Tumorlongitudinal CT colonographymurine modelsoverdiagnosisquantitative mass spectrometrytumor volume

Identifiers

PMID30971492
PMCPMC6486772
OpenAlexW2940139661

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.