Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30971452›Full record

ArticleScience translational medicine2019

Cbp-dependent histone acetylation mediates axon regeneration induced by environmental enrichment in rodent spinal cord injury models.

Thomas H Hutson, Claudia Kathe, Ilaria Palmisano, Kay Bartholdi, Arnau Hervera, Francesco De Virgiliis, Eilidh McLachlan, Luming Zhou, Guiping Kong, Quentin Barraud and 14 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Science translational medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 65 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
65citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

65 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 131 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Electroacupuncture combined with rTMS promotes neuronal regenerationEuropean journal of histochemistry : EJH · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Repurposing of Chemokine Antagonists for Combined Phase-Resolved Spinal Cord Injury Treatment.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

5 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors at 9 institutions in 7 countries.

Thomas H HutsonCentre for Restorative Neuroscience, Division of Brain Sciences, Department of Medicine, Imperial College London, London W12 0NN, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6795-2688
Claudia KatheNeurorestoration Group, Wolfson Centre for Age-Related Diseases, King's College London, London SE1 1UL, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6441-1755
Ilaria PalmisanoCentre for Restorative Neuroscience, Division of Brain Sciences, Department of Medicine, Imperial College London, London W12 0NN, UK.
Kay BartholdiBrain Mind Institute and Center for Neuroprosthetics, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), 1202 Geneva, Switzerland.
Arnau HerveraCentre for Restorative Neuroscience, Division of Brain Sciences, Department of Medicine, Imperial College London, London W12 0NN, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8362-369X
Francesco De VirgiliisCentre for Restorative Neuroscience, Division of Brain Sciences, Department of Medicine, Imperial College London, London W12 0NN, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7170-1013
Eilidh McLachlanCentre for Restorative Neuroscience, Division of Brain Sciences, Department of Medicine, Imperial College London, London W12 0NN, UK.
Luming ZhouCentre for Restorative Neuroscience, Division of Brain Sciences, Department of Medicine, Imperial College London, London W12 0NN, UK.
Guiping KongCentre for Restorative Neuroscience, Division of Brain Sciences, Department of Medicine, Imperial College London, London W12 0NN, UK.
Quentin BarraudBrain Mind Institute and Center for Neuroprosthetics, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), 1202 Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-0894-1959
Matt C DanziMiami Project to Cure Paralysis, University of Miami, Miami, FL 33136, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1568-5965
Alejandro Medrano-FernandezInstituto de Neurociencias, Universidad Miguel Hernandez Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, 03550 Alicante, Spain.
Jose P Lopez-AtalayaInstituto de Neurociencias, Universidad Miguel Hernandez Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, 03550 Alicante, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-6064-7584
Anne L BoutillierUniversité de Strasbourg, CNRS, UMR 7364, Laboratoire de Neuroscience Cognitives et Adaptatives (LNCA), F-67000 Strasbourg, France.ORCID 0000-0002-2317-9280
Sarmistha H SinhaTranscription and Disease Laboratory, Jawaharlal Nehru Centre for Advanced Scientific Research, Bangalore 560064, India.ORCID 0000-0002-2056-8221
Akash K SinghTranscription and Disease Laboratory, Jawaharlal Nehru Centre for Advanced Scientific Research, Bangalore 560064, India.ORCID 0000-0002-7460-2886
Piyush ChaturbedyNanomaterials and Catalysis Laboratory, Chemistry and Physics of Materials Unit, JNCASR, Bangalore 560064, India.
Lawrence D F MoonNeurorestoration Group, Wolfson Centre for Age-Related Diseases, King's College London, London SE1 1UL, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9622-0312
Tapas K KunduTranscription and Disease Laboratory, Jawaharlal Nehru Centre for Advanced Scientific Research, Bangalore 560064, India.ORCID 0000-0001-7790-214X
John L BixbyMiami Project to Cure Paralysis, University of Miami, Miami, FL 33136, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1633-5318
Vance P LemmonMiami Project to Cure Paralysis, University of Miami, Miami, FL 33136, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3550-7576
Angel BarcoInstituto de Neurociencias, Universidad Miguel Hernandez Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, 03550 Alicante, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-0653-3751
Gregoire CourtineBrain Mind Institute and Center for Neuroprosthetics, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), 1202 Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-5744-4142
Simone Di GiovanniCentre for Restorative Neuroscience, Division of Brain Sciences, Department of Medicine, Imperial College London, London W12 0NN, UK. s.di-giovanni@imperial.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0003-3154-5399
Imperial College London · GBÉcole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne · CHHertie Institute for Clinical Brain Research · DEJawaharlal Nehru Centre for Advanced Scientific Research · INUniversitat de Miguel Hernández d'Elx · ESUniversity of Miami · USKing's College London · GBCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRNanomaterials Research (United States) · US

Funding

Novel Gene Targets for CNS Axonal RegenerationR01HD057632 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI BIXBY, JOHN L, LEMMON, VANCE P · 2007 to 2018
$4.7M
Medical Research Council MR/R005311/1NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD057632
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

After a spinal cord injury, axons fail to regenerate in the adult mammalian central nervous system, leading to permanent deficits in sensory and motor functions. Increasing neuronal activity after an injury using electrical stimulation or rehabilitation can enhance neuronal plasticity and result in some degree of recovery; however, the underlying mechanisms remain poorly understood. We found that placing mice in an enriched environment before an injury enhanced the activity of proprioceptive dorsal root ganglion neurons, leading to a lasting increase in their regenerative potential. This effect was dependent on Creb-binding protein (Cbp)-mediated histone acetylation, which increased the expression of genes associated with the regenerative program. Intraperitoneal delivery of a small-molecule activator of Cbp at clinically relevant times promoted regeneration and sprouting of sensory and motor axons, as well as recovery of sensory and motor functions in both the mouse and rat model of spinal cord injury. Our findings showed that the increased regenerative capacity induced by enhancing neuronal activity is mediated by epigenetic reprogramming in rodent models of spinal cord injury. Understanding the mechanisms underlying activity-dependent neuronal plasticity led to the identification of potential molecular targets for improving recovery after spinal cord injury.

Indexed as

EnvironmentNerve RegenerationAcetylationAnimalsAxonsCalciumCREB-Binding ProteinDisease Models, AnimalE1A-Associated p300 ProteinGanglia, SpinalHistonesMiceMotor NeuronsProprioceptionRecovery of FunctionSensory Receptor CellsCalciumCREB-Binding ProteinE1A-Associated p300 ProteinEp300 protein, mouseHistones

Identifiers

PMID30971452
PMCPMC7355732
OpenAlexW2940379422

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.