Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30971412›Full record

ArticleBiology open2019

Microenvironmental stimuli induce different macrophage polarizations in experimental models of emphysema.

Júlia Benini Kohler, Daniela Aparecida de Brito Cervilha, Alyne Riani Moreira, Fernanda Roncon Santana, Talita M Farias, Maria Isabel Cardoso Alonso Vale, Milton de Arruda Martins, Carla Máximo Prado, Iolanda Calvo Tibério, Juliana Tiyaki Ito and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biology open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Júlia Benini KohlerDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Laboratory of Experimental Therapeutics (LIM-20), School of Medicine, University of São Paulo, São Paulo 01246-903, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9178-2073
Daniela Aparecida de Brito CervilhaDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Laboratory of Experimental Therapeutics (LIM-20), School of Medicine, University of São Paulo, São Paulo 01246-903, Brazil.
Alyne Riani MoreiraDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Laboratory of Experimental Therapeutics (LIM-20), School of Medicine, University of São Paulo, São Paulo 01246-903, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5885-6990
Fernanda Roncon SantanaDepartment of Biological Science, Federal University of São Paulo, Santos 09972-270, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5837-4310
Talita M FariasDepartment of Bioscience, Federal University of São Paulo, Diadema 09961-400, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3307-2735
Maria Isabel Cardoso Alonso ValeDepartment of Bioscience, Federal University of São Paulo, Diadema 09961-400, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5847-8080
Milton de Arruda MartinsDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Laboratory of Experimental Therapeutics (LIM-20), School of Medicine, University of São Paulo, São Paulo 01246-903, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9690-9371
Carla Máximo PradoDepartment of Biological Science, Federal University of São Paulo, Santos 09972-270, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1160-0442
Iolanda Calvo TibérioDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Laboratory of Experimental Therapeutics (LIM-20), School of Medicine, University of São Paulo, São Paulo 01246-903, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5662-7895
Juliana Tiyaki ItoDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Laboratory of Experimental Therapeutics (LIM-20), School of Medicine, University of São Paulo, São Paulo 01246-903, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9438-5292
Fernanda Degobbi Tenorio Quirino Dos Santos LopesDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Laboratory of Experimental Therapeutics (LIM-20), School of Medicine, University of São Paulo, São Paulo 01246-903, Brazil fernandadtqsl@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6402-3055
Universidade de São Paulo · BRUniversidade Federal de São Paulo · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Macrophages play a pivotal role in the development of emphysema and depending on the microenvironment stimuli can be polarized into M1- or M2-like macrophage phenotypes. We compared macrophage polarizations in cigarette smoke (CS)- and porcine pancreatic elastase (PPE)-induced emphysema models. C57BL/6 mice were subdivided into four experimental groups. In the PPE group, animals received an intranasal instillation of PPE (0.677 IU); in the saline group, animals received an intranasal instillation of saline (0.9%). Animals from both groups were euthanized on day 28. In the CS group, animals were exposed to CS for 30 min, twice a day, 5 days per week for 12 weeks. In the control group, animals received filtered air. We observed an increase in total macrophages for both experimental models. For M1-like macrophage markers, we observed an increase in TNF-α

Indexed as

Animal modelM1-like phenotypesM2-like phenotypesMacrophages polarizationPulmonary emphysema

Identifiers

PMID30971412
PMCPMC6504010
OpenAlexW2937702903

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.