Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30971324›Full record

ArticleBJPsych bulletin2019

Factors influencing use of community treatment orders and quality of care that people receive: results of a national survey in England and Wales.

Harry Lei, Kirsten Barnicot, Emily Maynard, Angela Etherington, Krysia Zalewska, Alan Quirk, Rahil Sanatinia, Stephen J Cooper, Mike J Crawford

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BJPsych bulletin, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Harry LeiImperial College London.
Kirsten BarnicotImperial College London.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5083-5135
Emily MaynardRoyal College of Psychiatrists, London.
Angela EtheringtonRoyal College of Psychiatrists, London.
Krysia ZalewskaRoyal College of Psychiatrists, London.
Alan QuirkRoyal College of Psychiatrists, London.
Rahil SanatiniaImperial College London.
Stephen J CooperRoyal College of Psychiatrists, London.
Mike J CrawfordRoyal College of Psychiatrists, London.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aims and methodWe conducted a secondary analysis of data from the National Audit of Psychosis to identify factors associated with use of community treatment orders (CTOs) and assess the quality of care that people on CTOs receive.

resultsBetween 1.1 and 20.2% of patients in each trust were being treated on a CTO. Male gender, younger age, greater use of in-patient services, coexisting substance misuse and problems with cognition predicted use of CTOs. Patients on CTOs were more likely to be screened for physical health, have a current care plan, be given contact details for crisis support, and be offered cognitive-behavioural therapy.Clinical implicationsCTOs appear to be used as a framework for delivering higher-quality care to people with more complex needs. High levels of variation in the use of CTOs indicate a need for better evidence about the effects of this approach to patient care.Declaration of interestNone.

Indexed as

community careCommunity treatment ordermental health actpsychosis

Identifiers

PMID30971324
PMCPMC12402922

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.