ArticleJournal of translational medicine2019
Comparison and development of machine learning tools in the prediction of chronic kidney disease progression.
Article in Journal of translational medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 99 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
99 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 298 citations in OpenAlex.
- Applications of artificial intelligence in chronic kidney disease: a systematic review.Revista de saude publica · 2026Pooled it
- Artificial intelligence in predicting chronic kidney disease prognosis. A systematic review and meta-analysis.Renal failure · 2024Pooled it
- Prediction of chronic kidney disease and its progression by artificial intelligence algorithms.Journal of nephrology · 2022Pooled it
- Machine learning algorithms' accuracy in predicting kidney disease progression: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2022Pooled it
- Trial
- Scoring model to predict risk of chronic kidney disease in Chinese health screening examinees with type 2 diabetes.International urology and nephrology · 2022Trial
- Predicting intradialytic exercise intolerance in maintenance hemodialysis patients: an interpretable machine learning approach integrating functional assessments.Renal failure · 2026Observational
- Applications of Machine Learning for Early Diagnosis and Prognosis of Chronic Kidney Disease: Current Evidence.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Predicting Chronic Kidney Disease from Biomarkers: An Explainable Machine Learning Approach.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Development and external validation of a machine learning model for predicting post-CABG acute kidney injury: insights from MIMIC database and real-world cardiac surgery cohort.BMC nephrology · 2026Article
- Emerging Urinary Biomarkers and Innovative Technologies for the Early Detection and Personalized Management of Chronic Kidney Disease.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- An informed monotone neural network for multi-stage chronic kidney disease prediction with integrated GFR estimation.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Prediction of Five-Year Mortality Risk of Chronic Kidney Disease Using Artificial Intelligence-Based Models: A Retrospective Study.Health science reports · 2026Article
- Development of a high-altitude renal disease diagnostic model based on machine learning and multiple biomarker detection: a retrospective study of 19,068 patients.BMC nephrology · 2026Article
- The Association of Social Determinants of Health on Mortality among Adults with End-Stage Kidney Disease: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of racial and ethnic health disparities · 2026Review
- Application of XGBoost and logistic regression in predicting 90 days mortality for elderly severe acute renal failure patients.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- An intelligent ensemble machine learning model for early detection of chronic kidney disease in aging populations.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Exploring the association between volatile organic compound exposure and chronic kidney disease: evidence from explainable machine learning methods.Renal failure · 2025Article
- Machine learning models for predicting short-term progression in patients with stage 4 chronic kidney disease: a multi-center validation study.Scientific reports · 2025Observational
- Clinical Application of Machine Learning Models for Early-Stage Chronic Kidney Disease Detection.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
39 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundUrinary protein quantification is critical for assessing the severity of chronic kidney disease (CKD). However, the current procedure for determining the severity of CKD is completed through evaluating 24-h urinary protein, which is inconvenient during follow-up.
objectiveTo quickly predict the severity of CKD using more easily available demographic and blood biochemical features during follow-up, we developed and compared several predictive models using statistical, machine learning and neural network approaches.
methodsThe clinical and blood biochemical results from 551 patients with proteinuria were collected. Thirteen blood-derived tests and 5 demographic features were used as non-urinary clinical variables to predict the 24-h urinary protein outcome response. Nine predictive models were established and compared, including logistic regression, Elastic Net, lasso regression, ridge regression, support vector machine, random forest, XGBoost, neural network and k-nearest neighbor. The AU-ROC, sensitivity (recall), specificity, accuracy, log-loss and precision of each of the models were evaluated. The effect sizes of each variable were analysed and ranked.
resultsThe linear models including Elastic Net, lasso regression, ridge regression and logistic regression showed the highest overall predictive power, with an average AUC and a precision above 0.87 and 0.8, respectively. Logistic regression ranked first, reaching an AUC of 0.873, with a sensitivity and specificity of 0.83 and 0.82, respectively. The model with the highest sensitivity was Elastic Net (0.85), while XGBoost showed the highest specificity (0.83). In the effect size analyses, we identified that ALB, Scr, TG, LDL and EGFR had important impacts on the predictability of the models, while other predictors such as CRP, HDL and SNA were less important.
conclusionsBlood-derived tests could be applied as non-urinary predictors during outpatient follow-up. Features in routine blood tests, including ALB, Scr, TG, LDL and EGFR levels, showed predictive ability for CKD severity. The developed online tool can facilitate the prediction of proteinuria progress during follow-up in clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.