Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30971279›Full record

ArticleTrials2019

Optimising recruitment into trials using an internal pilot.

W Bertram, A Moore, V Wylde, R Gooberman-Hill

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Trials, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

W BertramMusculoskeletal Research Unit, Translational Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Level 1, Learning & Research Building, Southmead Hospital, Bristol, BS10 5NB, UK. Wendy.Bertram@bristol.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8234-2052
A MooreMusculoskeletal Research Unit, Translational Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Level 1, Learning & Research Building, Southmead Hospital, Bristol, BS10 5NB, UK.
V WyldeMusculoskeletal Research Unit, Translational Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Level 1, Learning & Research Building, Southmead Hospital, Bristol, BS10 5NB, UK.
R Gooberman-HillMusculoskeletal Research Unit, Translational Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Level 1, Learning & Research Building, Southmead Hospital, Bristol, BS10 5NB, UK.

Funding

Department of Health RP-PG-0613-20001Programme Grants for Applied Research RP-PG- 0613-20001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRecruitment to trials can be difficult. Despite careful planning and research that outlines ways to improve recruitment, many trials do not achieve their target on time and require extensions of funding or time.

methodsWe describe a trial in which an internal pilot with embedded qualitative research was used to improve recruitment processes and inform recruitment projections for the main trial. At the end of the pilot, it was clear that the sample size would not be met on time. Three steps were taken to optimise recruitment: (1) adjustments were made to the recruitment process using information from the qualitative work done in the pilot and advice from a patient and public involvement group, (2) additional recruiting sites were included based on site feasibility assessments and (3) a projection equation was used to estimate recruitment at each site and overall trial recruitment.

resultsQualitative work during the pilot phase allowed us to develop strategies to optimise recruitment during the main trial, which were incorporated into patient information packs, the standard operating procedures and training sessions with recruiters. From our experience of feasibility assessments, we developed a checklist of recommended considerations for feasibility assessments. For recruitment projections, we developed a four-stage projection equation that estimates the number of participants recruited using a conversion rate of the number randomised divided by the number screened.

conclusionsThis work provides recommendations for feasibility assessments and an easy-to-use projection tool, which can be applied to other trials to help ensure they reach the required sample size.

trial registrationISRCTN, ISRCTN92545361 . Registered on 6 September 2016.

Indexed as

Clinical Trials as TopicPatient SelectionFeasibility StudiesHumansPilot ProjectsQualitative Research

Identifiers

PMID30971279
PMCPMC6458725

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.