ArticleJournal of orthopaedic surgery and research2019
SponDT (Spondylodiscitis Diagnosis and Treatment): spondylodiscitis scoring system.
Article in Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.
- Oedema on STIR modified the effect of amoxicillin as treatment for chronic low back pain with Modic changes-subgroup analysis of a randomized trial.European radiology · 2021Trial
- Epidural Abscess in Routine Preoperative MRI Reports Versus Documented Operative Findings, and Exploratory Mortality Risk Factors in Surgically Treated Spondylodiscitis: A Retrospective Single-Centre Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Using C-Reactive Protein Measurements to Predict Treatment Failure in Native Vertebral Osteomyelitis: A Multisite Retrospective Cohort Study Cohort Study.Open forum infectious diseases · 2026Article
- Clinical and radiological features of infectious spondylodiscitis in an Italian cohort: a retrospective study.Brain & spine · 2026Article
- What Is Worse: A Comparison of Solitary Versus Multifocal Pyogenic Spondylodiscitis Using a Nationwide Analysis of Readmission Rates and Risk Factors.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- The Impact of Location on De Novo Spondylodiscitis: Regions Matter but Are Secondary to Comorbidities.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- [Medecine tropicale et sante internationale · 2025Article
- Evaluation of the SITE score for de-novo spinal infection patients in clinical practice - A case-based approach.Brain & spine · 2025Article
- Spondylodiscitis and Its Mimickers: A Pictorial Review.Biomedicines · 2024Review
- Diagnosis and Treatment of Spondylodiscitis: Insights From a Five-Year Single-Center Study.Cureus · 2024Article
- Antimicrobial Treatment Challenges in the Management of Infective Spondylodiscitis Associated with Hemodialysis: A Comprehensive Review of Literature and Case Series Analysis.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Clinical and epidemiological aspects of spondylodiscitis in a tertiary care hospital in South India.Le infezioni in medicina · 2024Article
- Post-COVID-19 Spondylodiscitis: A Case Study and Review of the Literature.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2023Review
- The Hamburg Spondylodiscitis Assessment Score (HSAS) for Immediate Evaluation of Mortality Risk on Hospital Admission.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Article
- Diagnosis of vertebral osteomyelitis.Journal of bone and joint infection · 2022Review
- Spinal disorders mimicking infection.Insights into imaging · 2021Review
- Single-stage debridement via autogenous iliac bone graft through the OLIF corridor and lateral fixation in treating spontaneous single-level lumbar pyogenic spondylodiscitis.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2021Article
- [Pyogenic spondylodiscitis: symptoms, diagnostics and therapeutic strategies].Der Orthopade · 2020Review
- Pyogenic spondylodiscitis : The quest towards a clinical-radiological classification.Der Orthopade · 2020Review
- Spondylodiscitis: Understanding pathophysiology, surgical strategies, and postoperative management - A single-center study.Journal of craniovertebral junction & spineArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSpondylodiscitis is a chameleon among infectious diseases due to the lack of specific symptoms with which it is associated. It is nevertheless a serious infection, with 7% mortality of hospitalized patients, in large part because of delayed diagnosis. The aim of this study was to develop a diagnosis and course-of-disease index to optimize its treatment. MATERIAL AND
methodsThrough analysis of 296 patients between January 1998 and December 2013, we developed a scoring system for spondylodiscitis, which we term SponDT (Spondylodiscitis Diagnosis and Treatment) based on three traits: (1) the inflammatory marker C-reactive protein (CRP) (mg/dl), (2) pain according to a numeric rating scale (NRS) and (3) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), to monitor its progression following treatment.
resultsThe number of patients receiving treatment increased over the past 15 years of our study. We also found an increasing age of patients at the point of diagnosis across the study, with an average age of 67.7 years. In 34% of patients, spondylodiscitis developed spontaneously. Almost 70% of them did not receive treatment until the first diagnosis using SponDT. Following treatment against spondylodiscitis, pain intensity decreased from 6.0 to 3.1 NRS. The inflammatory markers also decreased (CRP from 119.2 to 46.7 mg/dl). Similarly, MRI revealed a regression in inflammation following treatment. By employing SponDT, patients were diagnosed and entered into treatment with a score of 5.6 (severe spondylodiscitis) and discharged with a score of 2.4 (light/healed spondylodiscitis).
conclusionSponDT can be used to support the diagnosis of spondylodiscitis, particularly in patients suffering from back pain and elevated levels of inflammation, and can be used during the course of treatment to optimize control of therapy. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IIa-evidence from at least one well-designed controlled trial which is not randomized.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.