Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30971254›Full record

ArticleInternational journal for equity in health2019

Exploring the equity impact of a maternal and newborn health intervention: a qualitative study of participatory women's groups in rural South Asia and Africa.

Joanna Morrison, David Osrin, Glyn Alcock, Kishwar Azad, Jyoti Bamjan, Bharat Budhathoki, Abdul Kuddus, Mahfuza Akter Mala, Dharma Manandhar, Albert Nkhata and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in International journal for equity in health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
6.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Does theGlobal mental health (Cambridge, England) · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 6 institutions in 6 countries.

Joanna MorrisonInstitute for Global Health, University College London, 30 Guilford Street, London, WC1N 1EH, UK. Joanna.morrison@ucl.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-9241-8863
David OsrinInstitute for Global Health, University College London, 30 Guilford Street, London, WC1N 1EH, UK.
Glyn AlcockInstitute for Global Health, University College London, 30 Guilford Street, London, WC1N 1EH, UK.
Kishwar AzadBADAS, Room No-390, BIRDEM Building 122,Kazi Nazrul Islam Avenue,Shahbagh, Dhaka, 1000, Bangladesh.
Jyoti BamjanMIRA, PO Box 921, Thapathali, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Bharat BudhathokiMIRA, PO Box 921, Thapathali, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Abdul KuddusBADAS, Room No-390, BIRDEM Building 122,Kazi Nazrul Islam Avenue,Shahbagh, Dhaka, 1000, Bangladesh.
Mahfuza Akter MalaActionAid Bangladesh, R#136, H#08, Gulshan 1, Dhaka, 1212, Bangladesh.
Dharma ManandharMIRA, PO Box 921, Thapathali, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Albert NkhataMaiMwana Project, Box 2, Mchinji, Malawi.
Shrijana PathakMIRA, PO Box 921, Thapathali, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Tambosi PhiriMaiMwana Project, Box 2, Mchinji, Malawi.
Shibanand Rath, Jharkhand, India.
Prasanta Tripathy, Jharkhand, India.
Anthony CostelloInstitute for Global Health, University College London, 30 Guilford Street, London, WC1N 1EH, UK.
Tanja A J Houweling, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Mother and Infant Research Activities · NPUniversity College London · GBBangladesh Institute of Research and Rehabilitation for Diabetes Endocrine and Metabolic Disorders · BDCentral University of Jharkhand · INMuseum of Malawi · MWInstitute of Child Health · GR

Funding

Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 085417MA/Z/08/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA consensus is developing on interventions to improve newborn survival, but little is known about how to reduce socioeconomic inequalities in newborn mortality in low- and middle-income countries. Participatory learning and action (PLA) through women's groups can improve newborn survival and home care practices equitably across socioeconomic strata, as shown in cluster randomised controlled trials. We conducted a qualitative study to understand the mechanisms that led to the equitable impact of the PLA approach across socioeconomic strata in four trial sites in India, Nepal, Bangladesh, and Malawi.

methodsWe conducted 42 focus group discussions (FGDs) with women who had attended groups and women who had not attended, in poor and better-off communities. We also interviewed six better-off women and nine poor women who had delivered babies during the trials and had demonstrated recommended behaviours. We conducted 12 key informant interviews and five FGDs with women's group facilitators and fieldworkers.

resultsWomen's groups addressed a knowledge deficit in poor and better-off women. Women were engaged through visual learning and participatory tools, and learned from the facilitator and each other. Facilitators enabled inclusion of all socioeconomic strata, ensuring that strategies were low-cost and that discussions and advice were relevant. Groups provided a social support network that addressed some financial barriers to care and gave women the confidence to promote behaviour change. Information was disseminated through home visits and other strategies. The social process of learning and action, which led to increased knowledge, confidence to act, and acceptability of recommended practices, was key to ensuring behaviour change across social strata. These equitable effects were enabled by the accessibility, relevance, and engaging format of the intervention.

conclusionsParticipatory learning and action led to increased knowledge, confidence to act, and acceptability of recommended practices. The equitable behavioural effects were facilitated by the accessibility, relevance, and engaging format of the intervention across socioeconomic groups, and by reaching-out to parts of the population usually not accessed. A PLA approach improved health behaviours across socioeconomic strata in rural communities, around issues for which there was a knowledge deficit and where simple changes could be made at home.

Indexed as

Health EquityHealth PromotionAfricaAsiaFemaleFocus GroupsHealth Impact AssessmentHumansInfant HealthInfant, NewbornMaternal HealthPregnancyQualitative ResearchRural PopulationSocioeconomic FactorsBehavior changeCommunity mobilizationCommunity participationHealth inequalitiesMaternal and child healthQualitative researchSocio-economic

Identifiers

PMID30971254
PMCPMC6458781
OpenAlexW2945982835

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.