Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30971215›Full record

Trial reportBMC geriatrics2019

Continuation versus discontinuation of treatment for severe dementia: randomized, pragmatic, open-label, clinical trial to evaluate the efficacy of continuing drug treatment in patients with severe dementia (STOP-DEM).

Aina Soler, Guillem Amer, Alicia Leiva, Joana Ripoll, María Angeles Llorente, Alfonso Leiva, Joana Maria Taltavull, Rosa Molina, Joan Llobera

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative StudyMulticenter StudyPragmatic Clinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC geriatrics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Aina SolerPrimary Care Research Unit of Mallorca, Baleares Health Services-IbSalut, Palma, Spain. ainasoler@ibsalut.caib.es.
Guillem AmerSon Espases Hospital, Baleares Health Services-IbSalut, Palma, Spain.
Alicia LeivaPrimary Care Research Unit of Mallorca, Baleares Health Services-IbSalut, Palma, Spain.
Joana RipollPrimary Care Research Unit of Mallorca, Baleares Health Services-IbSalut, Palma, Spain.
María Angeles LlorenteSon Pisa Health Care Centre, Baleares Health Services-IbSalut, Palma, Spain.
Alfonso LeivaPrimary Care Research Unit of Mallorca, Baleares Health Services-IbSalut, Palma, Spain.
Joana Maria TaltavullPrimary Care Research Unit of Mallorca, Baleares Health Services-IbSalut, Palma, Spain.
Rosa MolinaManacor Hospital, Baleares Health Services-IbSalut, Mallorca, Spain.
Joan LloberaPrimary Care Research Unit of Mallorca, Baleares Health Services-IbSalut, Palma, Spain.
Servei de Salut de les Illes Balears · ESFundación Hospital Manacor · ESHospital Universitario Son Espases · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrevious observational studies and clinical trials have shown that cholinesterase inhibitors (with or without memantine) provide benefit for patients with mild-to-moderate Alzheimer's disease. However, the impact of treatment continuation after progression to severe disease is unknown. The main aim of this study is to evaluate the effect and safety of continuing treatment with ChEIs (with or without memantine) for patients with severe dementia.

methodsThis randomized, pragmatic, open-label clinical trial with blinded evaluators will evaluate the efficacy of continuing drug treatment in patients with advanced dementia. A total of 302 community-dwelling patients with severe dementia, Alzheimer's disease, with or without a coexisting diagnosis of vascular dementia, and a score of 10 or less on the Mini-Mental State Examination who received previous treatment with a cholinesterase inhibitor (with or without memantine) for at least 3 months, will be randomized to continue or discontinue drug treatment. Follow-up will be 12 months or until the primary endpoint is achieved. The primary endpoint is entry into institutional care and progression of disability, defined as a loss of 2 of 4 basic functions, or 6 of 11 instrumental functions, according to the Bristol Activities of Daily Living Scale at 12 months. The secondary outcomes are patient changes in functional and cognitive state, quality of life, and caregiver burden. DISCUSSION: We expect that the results of our study will allow to identify if there is clinical relevant impact for patients and caregivers between maintaining or halting pharmacological treatment.

trial registrationThe study was prospectively registered in the REec (2017-000042-22) on May 11 2017 and ID ISRCTN12134230 on February 25 2019.

Indexed as

Severity of Illness IndexActivities of Daily LivingAgedAged, 80 and overCholinesterase InhibitorsDementiaFemaleHumansMaleMemantineQuality of LifeSingle-Blind MethodTreatment OutcomeWithholding TreatmentCholinesterase InhibitorsMemantineCholinesterase inhibitorsDementiaDeprescriptionRandomized controlled trial

Identifiers

PMID30971215
PMCPMC6458648
OpenAlexW2944596651

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.