ArticleEpigenetics2019
Using NGS-methylation profiling to understand the molecular pathogenesis of young MI patients who have subsequent cardiac events.
Article in Epigenetics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Application of DNA Methylome Analysis to Patients with ME/CFS.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2025Article
- A review on regulation of DNA methylation during post-myocardial infarction.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Globally, ischaemic heart disease is a major contributor to premature morbidity and mortality. A significant number of young Myocardial Infarction (MI) patients (aged <55 y) have subsequent cardiac events within a year of their index event. This study used Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) methylation to understand the pathogenesis in this subset of young MI patients, comparing them to a cohort of patients without recurrent events. Cases and controls were matched for age, gender, ethnicity, and comorbidities. Differential methylation analyses were performed on Reduced Representation Bisulphite Sequencing (RRBS) data. Across the group and within case-control pairs' variation were analysed. Pairwise comparisons across each matched case-control pair resulted in a list of genes that were consistently significantly differentially methylated between all 16 matched pairs. This gene list was input into pathway analysis databases. Of particular relevance to cardiac pathology the following pathways were identified as over-represented in the patients with recurrent events; cell adhesion, transcription regulation and cardiac electrical conduction, specifically relating to calcium channel activity. This study looked at methylation differences between two populations of young MI patients. There were significantly different methylation profiles between the two groups studied; key pathways were identified as specifically affected in the patients with recurrent cardiac events. Matched pairwise comparisons and detailed interpretations of DNA methylation data may help to elucidate complex pathogeneses within and between clinical subtypes. Further analysis will determine whether these epigenomic differences can be useful as predictive biomarkers of clinical progression.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.