ArticleThe Journal of international medical research2019
Congenital brucellosis in a Chinese preterm neonate: A case report.
Article in The Journal of international medical research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Congenital brucellosis in a preterm infant: A case report from France and literature review.IDCases · 2026Article
- Congenital brucellosis in a newborn: A rare case report and clinical insights.The Journal of international medical research · 2025Article
- Neonatal Brucellosis in an Extremely Preterm Infant: A Fatal Case Report.Case reports in infectious diseases · 2025Article
- Congenital brucellosis: A case report.The Journal of international medical research · 2020Article
- Different Clinical Manifestations of Human Brucellosis in Pregnant Women: A Systematic Scoping Review of 521 Cases from 10 Countries.Infection and drug resistance · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Although extremely rare, congenital brucellosis can occur via perinatal transmission. We report a case of an infant born prematurely at 34-36 weeks' gestation who had pyrexia, shortness of breath, hepatosplenomegaly and thrombocytopenia. Blood cultures were positive for Gram-negative coccobacilli and Brucella infection was suspected. While, serological tests were negative for Brucella antibodies, B. melitensis infection was confirmed by polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Serology of the parents' blood confirmed the presence of Brucella. The family did not live in an endemic area but had ridden a camel 12 months before the pregnancy. The bacteria may have been sexually transmitted from father to mother and then to foetus via an intrauterine infection. In endemic areas or where the family has been in close contact with infected animals, brucellosis should be suspected in a severely ill neonate with an unknown infection. Thorough medical histories from the family are essential as early diagnosis and prompt therapy will almost certainly improve neonatal outcome.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.