ArticleJournal of preventive medicine and public health = Yebang Uihakhoe chi2019
Validity of Self-reported Hypertension and Factors Related to Discordance Between Self-reported and Objectively Measured Hypertension: Evidence From a Cohort Study in Iran.
Article in Journal of preventive medicine and public health = Yebang Uihakhoe chi, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Pooled it
- Treatment of amphetamine abuse/use disorder: a systematic review of a recent health concern.Daru : journal of Faculty of Pharmacy, Tehran University of Medical Sciences · 2019Pooled it
- Physical disability and risk of incident hypertension: a prospective cohort analysis.Journal of human hypertension · 2025Article
- Social determinants of health and hypertension screening among women in The Gambia: an evaluation of 2019-2020 demographic and health survey data.Journal of human hypertension · 2025Article
- Association between adult education, brain volume and dementia risk: longitudinal cohort study of UK Biobank participants.GeroScience · 2025Article
- Agreement between self-reported and objectively measured hypertension diagnosis and control: evidence from a nationally representative sample of community-dwelling middle-aged and older adults in China.Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique · 2024Article
- An Examination of the Agreement between Self-reported Diabetes and Paraclinical Tests, Medical Records, and Clinical Examinations: Insights from the Shahedieh Cohort Study, Yazd, Iran.Journal of caring sciences · 2024Article
- The impact of using self-report versus objective measures of cardiometabolic conditions in epidemiologic research: a case study from India using data from the longitudinal aging study in India.Frontiers in epidemiology · 2024Article
- Validation of self-reported hypertension in young adults in the US-based Growing Up Today Study (GUTS).PloS one · 2024Article
- Understanding Cognitive Deficits in People with High Blood Pressure.Journal of personalized medicine · 2023Article
- Using Relative and Absolute Measures for Socioeconomic Inequalities in Health: Experiences from a Retrospective Cohort Study on COVID-19.Iranian journal of public health · 2023Article
- Validity of self-reported hypertension and related factors in the adult population: Preliminary results from the cohort in the west of Iran.Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) · 2023Article
- National and regional prevalence rates of hypertension in Saudi Arabia: A descriptive analysis using the national survey data.Frontiers in public health · 2023Article
- Self-Reported Hypertension and Associated Factors Among Adults in Butambala District, Central Uganda: A Community-Based Prevalence Study.Integrated blood pressure control · 2023Article
- Identifying factors associated with of blood pressure using Structural Equation Modeling: evidence from a large Kurdish cohort study in Iran.BMC endocrine disorders · 2022Article
- Determinants of self-reported hypertension among women in South Africa: evidence from the population-based survey.Clinical hypertension · 2022Article
- Validity of self-reported hypertension in India: Evidence from nationally representative survey of adult population over 45 years.Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) · 2022Article
- Maternal perinatal hypertensive disorders and parenting in infancy.Infant behavior & development · 2022Article
- Socioeconomic inequalities in prevalence, awareness, treatment and control of hypertension: evidence from the PERSIAN cohort study.BMC public health · 2022Article
- Barriers to effective hypertension management in rural Bihar, India: A cross-sectional, linked supply- and demand-side study.PLOS global public health · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesSelf-reporting can be used to determine the incidence and prevalence of hypertension (HTN). The present study was conducted to determine the validity of self-reported HTN and to identify factors affecting discordance between self-reported and objectively measured HTN in participants in the Ravansar Non-Communicable Diseases (RaNCD) cohort.
methodsThe RaNCD cohort included permanent residents of Ravansar, Iran aged 35-65 years. Self-reported data were collected before clinical examinations were conducted by well-trained staff members. The gold standard for HTN was anti-hypertensive medication use and blood pressure measurements. The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and overall accuracy of self-reporting were calculated. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression were used to examine the discordance between self-reported HTN and the gold standard.
resultsOf the 10 065 participants in the RaNCD, 4755 (47.4%) were male. The prevalence of HTN was 16.8% based on self-reporting and 15.7% based on medical history and HTN measurements. Of the participants with HTN, 297 (18.8%) had no knowledge of their disease, and 313 (19.9%) had not properly controlled their HTN despite receiving treatment. The sensitivity, specificity, and kappa for self-reported HTN were 75.5%, 96.4%, and 73.4%, respectively. False positives became more likely with age, body mass index (BMI), low socioeconomic status, and female sex, whereas false negatives became more likely with age, BMI, high socioeconomic status, smoking, and urban residency.
conclusionsThe sensitivity and specificity of self-reported HTN were acceptable, suggesting that this method can be used for public health initiatives in the absence of countrywide HTN control and detection programs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.