Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30970978›Full record

ArticlePolymers2017

Enhancement of Wound Healing in Normal and Diabetic Mice by Topical Application of Amorphous Polyphosphate. Superior Effect of a Host⁻Guest Composite Material Composed of Collagen (Host) and Polyphosphate (Guest).

Werner E G Müller, Dinko Relkovic, Maximilian Ackermann, Shunfeng Wang, Meik Neufurth, Andrea Paravic Radicevic, Hiroshi Ushijima, Heinz-C Schröder, Xiaohong Wang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Polymers, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Werner E G MüllerERC Advanced Investigator Grant Research Group at the Institute for Physiological Chemistry, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Duesbergweg 6, 55128 Mainz, Germany. wmueller@uni-mainz.de.
Dinko RelkovicFidelta Ltd., Prilaz baruna Filipovića 29, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia. Dinko.Relkovic@glpg.com.
Maximilian AckermannInstitute of Functional and Clinical Anatomy, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University, Johann Joachim Becher Weg 13, D-55099 Mainz, Germany. maximilian.ackermann@uni-mainz.de.
Shunfeng WangERC Advanced Investigator Grant Research Group at the Institute for Physiological Chemistry, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Duesbergweg 6, 55128 Mainz, Germany. Shunwang@uni-mainz.de.
Meik NeufurthERC Advanced Investigator Grant Research Group at the Institute for Physiological Chemistry, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Duesbergweg 6, 55128 Mainz, Germany. mneufurt@uni-mainz.de.ORCID 0000-0002-2383-6412
Andrea Paravic RadicevicFidelta Ltd., Prilaz baruna Filipovića 29, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia. andrea.paravicradicevic@glpg.com.
Hiroshi UshijimaDivision of Microbiology, Department of Pathology and Microbiology, Nihon University School of Medicine, 30-1 Oyaguchi Kamicho, Itabashi-ku, Tokyo, 173-8610, Japan. ushijima-hiroshi@jcom.home.ne.jp.
Heinz-C SchröderERC Advanced Investigator Grant Research Group at the Institute for Physiological Chemistry, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Duesbergweg 6, 55128 Mainz, Germany. hschroed@uni-mainz.de.
Xiaohong WangERC Advanced Investigator Grant Research Group at the Institute for Physiological Chemistry, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Duesbergweg 6, 55128 Mainz, Germany. wang013@uni-mainz.de.ORCID 0000-0003-1796-6314
Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz · DEPliva (Croatia) · HRNihon University · JP

Funding

ERC Advanced Investigator Grant (grant number 268476) 268476
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The effect of polyphosphate (polyP) microparticles on wound healing was tested both in vitro and in a mice model in vivo. Two approaches were used: pure salts of polyphosphate, fabricated as amorphous microparticles (MPs, consisting of calcium and magnesium salts of polyP, "Ca⁻polyp-MPs" and "Mg⁻polyp-MPs"), and host⁻guest composite particles, prepared from amorphous collagen (host) and polyphosphate (guest), termed "col/polyp-MPs". Animal experiments with polyP on healing of excisional wounds were performed using both normal mice and diabetic mice. After a healing period of 7 days "Ca⁻polyp-MP" significantly improved re-epithelialization in normal mice from 31% (control) to 72% (polyP microparticle-treated). Importantly, in diabetic mice, particularly the host⁻guest particles "col/polyp-MP", increased the rate of re-epithelialization to ≈40% (control, 23%). In addition, those particles increased the expression of COL-I and COL-III as well as the expression the α-smooth muscle actin and the plasminogen activator inhibitor-1. We propose that "Ca⁻polyp-MPs", and particularly the host⁻guest "col/polyp-MPs" are useful for topical treatment of wounds.

Indexed as

collagendelayed wound healingdiabetic micemicroparticlesPAI-1polyphosphatere-epithelialization

Identifiers

PMID30970978
PMCPMC6432407
OpenAlexW2738586441

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.