Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30970671›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2019

Identifying Participants Who Would Benefit the Most from an Adult Food-literacy Program.

Andrea Begley, Lucy M Butcher, Vanessa Bobongie, Satvinder S Dhaliwal

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Identifying Who Improves or Maintains Their Food Literacy Behaviours after Completing an Adult Program.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Andrea BegleySchool of Public Health, Curtin University, Perth 6102, Australia. a.begley@curtin.edu.au.
Lucy M ButcherFoodbank Western Australia, Perth Airport 6105, Australia. lucy.butcher@foodbankwa.org.au.
Vanessa BobongieFoodbank Western Australia, Perth Airport 6105, Australia. vanessa.bobongie@foodbankwa.org.au.
Satvinder S DhaliwalSchool of Public Health, Curtin University, Perth 6102, Australia. s.dhaliwal@curtin.edu.au.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Food literacy programs aim to improve behaviours required to achieve a quality diet. The objectives of this study were to assess the demographic, food literacy related and dietary behaviour of participants enrolling in Food Sensations

Indexed as

Health LiteracyAdultCross-Sectional StudiesDietFeeding BehaviorFemaleFood PreferencesHumansMaleMiddle AgedReproducibility of ResultsSocioeconomic FactorsSurveys and Questionnairescommunity participationdietary intakefood literacy

Identifiers

PMID30970671
PMCPMC6480264

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.