Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30970655›Full record

Trial reportMedicina (Kaunas, Lithuania)2019

Influence of New Technologies on Post-Stroke Rehabilitation: A Comparison of Armeo Spring to the Kinect System.

Aušra Adomavičienė, Kristina Daunoravičienė, Raimondas Kubilius, Lina Varžaitytė, Juozas Raistenskis

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readClinical TrialComparative Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 34 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06500611 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Combined Effects Of Sensory Integration And Vestibular Exercises On Dizziness, Fall Risk And Quality Of Life In Post-Stroke Patients

TypeinterventionalSponsorRiphah International UniversityRan2024 to 2025Enrolled38ConditionsPost StrokeArmsSensory Integration and Vestibular Exercise with Routine Physical Therapy, Vestibular Exercise with Routine Physical Therapy
NCT07384143 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Exploring Cognitive Recovery: the Impact of Sensor-based Robotic Rehabilitation in Neurological and Neurodegenerative Disorders

TypeinterventionalSponsorIRCCS Centro Neurolesi Bonino PulejoRan2025 to 2030Enrolled189ConditionsPARKINSON DISEASE (Disorder), Multiple Sclerosis, Stroke, Neurological DisordersArmsSensor-Based Robotic Rehabilitation with Cognitive Tasks (SBRR), Standard Conventional Therapy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Occupational therapy for cognitive impairment in stroke patients.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2022
    Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Serious games for upper limb rehabilitation after stroke: a meta-analysis.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2021
    Pooled it
  8. Augmented reality for stroke rehabilitation during COVID-19.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2022
    Trial
  9. The Use of ArmeoSensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Trial
  10. Evaluation of an upper limb robotic rehabilitation program on motor functions, quality of life, cognition, and emotional status in patients with stroke: a randomized controlled study.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2022
    Trial
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Aušra AdomavičienėDepartment of Rehabilitation, Physical and Sports Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Vilnius University, Santariskiu g.2, LT-08661 Vilnius, Lithuania. ausra.adomaviciene@gmail.com.
Kristina DaunoravičienėDepartment of Biomechanical Engineering, Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, J. Basanavičiaus g. 28, 03224 Vilnius, Lithuania. kristina.daunoraviciene@vgtu.lt.
Raimondas KubiliusRehabilitation Department, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Eiveniu g. 2, LT-50161 Kaunas, Lithuania. raimondas.kubilius@kaunoklinikos.lt.
Lina VaržaitytėRehabilitation Department, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Eiveniu g. 2, LT-50161 Kaunas, Lithuania. lina.varzaityte@gmail.com.
Juozas RaistenskisDepartment of Rehabilitation, Physical and Sports Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Vilnius University, Santariskiu g.2, LT-08661 Vilnius, Lithuania. juozas.raistenskis@santa.lt.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNew technologies to improve post-stroke rehabilitation outcomes are of great interest and have a positive impact on functional, motor, and cognitive recovery. Identifying the most effective rehabilitation intervention is a recognized priority for stroke research and provides an opportunity to achieve a more desirable effect.

objectiveThe objective is to verify the effect of new technologies on motor outcomes of the upper limbs, functional state, and cognitive functions in post-stroke rehabilitation.

methodsForty two post-stroke patients (8.69 ± 4.27 weeks after stroke onset) were involved in the experimental study during inpatient rehabilitation. Patients were randomly divided into two groups: conventional programs were combined with the Armeo Spring robot-assisted trainer (Armeo group; n = 17) and the Kinect-based system (Kinect group; n = 25). The duration of sessions with the new technological devices was 45 min/day (10 sessions in total). Functional recovery was compared among groups using the Functional Independence Measure (FIM), and upper limbs' motor function recovery was compared using the Fugl⁻Meyer Assessment Upper Extremity (FMA-UE), Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS), Hand grip strength (dynamometry), Hand Tapping test (HTT), Box and Block Test (BBT), and kinematic measures (active Range Of Motion (ROM)), while cognitive functions were assessed by the MMSE (Mini-Mental State Examination), ACE-R (Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination-Revised), and HAD (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale) scores.

resultsFunctional independence did not show meaningful differences in scores between technologies (p > 0.05), though abilities of self-care were significantly higher after Kinect-based training (p < 0.05). The upper limbs' kinematics demonstrated higher functional recovery after robot training: decreased muscle tone, improved shoulder and elbow ROMs, hand dexterity, and grip strength (p < 0.05). Besides, virtual reality games involve more arm rotation and performing wider movements. Both new technologies caused an increase in overall global cognitive changes, but visual constructive abilities (attention, memory, visuospatial abilities, and complex commands) were statistically higher after robotic therapy. Furthermore, decreased anxiety level was observed after virtual reality therapy (p < 0.05).

conclusionsOur study displays that even a short-term, two-week training program with new technologies had a positive effect and significantly recovered post-strokes functional level in self-care, upper limb motor ability (dexterity and movements, grip strength, kinematic data), visual constructive abilities (attention, memory, visuospatial abilities, and complex commands) and decreased anxiety level.

Indexed as

CognitionAgedAnalysis of VarianceAnxietyAttentionBiomechanical PhenomenaDouble-Blind MethodExercise TherapyFemaleHand StrengthHumansMaleMemoryMiddle AgedProspective StudiesRange of Motion, ArticularArmeocognitive recoveryhand motor functionKinectstroke rehabilitation

Identifiers

PMID30970655
PMCPMC6524064

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.