Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30970571›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2019

A Computational Model for Assessing the Population Health Impact of Introducing a Modified Risk Claim on an Existing Smokeless Tobacco Product.

Raheema S Muhammad-Kah, Yezdi B Pithawalla, Edward L Boone, Lai Wei, Michael A Jones, Ryan A Black, Thomas M Bryan, Mohamadi A Sarkar

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Estimating the Population Health Impact of Recently Introduced Modified Risk Tobacco Products: A Comparison of Different Approaches.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2021
    Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Raheema S Muhammad-KahRegulatory Affairs, Center for Research & Technology, Altria Client Services LLC, 601 East Jackson Street, Richmond, VA 23219, USA. raheema.s.muhammad-kah@altria.com.
Yezdi B PithawallaRegulatory Affairs, Center for Research & Technology, Altria Client Services LLC, 601 East Jackson Street, Richmond, VA 23219, USA. Yezdi.B.Pithawalla@altria.com.
Edward L BooneDepartment of Statistical Sciences & Operations Research, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA 23284, USA. elboone@vcu.edu.
Lai WeiRegulatory Affairs, Center for Research & Technology, Altria Client Services LLC, 601 East Jackson Street, Richmond, VA 23219, USA. Lai.Wei@altria.com.
Michael A JonesRegulatory Affairs, Center for Research & Technology, Altria Client Services LLC, 601 East Jackson Street, Richmond, VA 23219, USA. Michael.A.Jones@altria.com.
Ryan A BlackRegulatory Affairs, Center for Research & Technology, Altria Client Services LLC, 601 East Jackson Street, Richmond, VA 23219, USA. Ryan.A.Black@altria.com.
Thomas M BryanRegulatory Affairs, Center for Research & Technology, Altria Client Services LLC, 601 East Jackson Street, Richmond, VA 23219, USA. Thomas.M.Bryan@altria.com.
Mohamadi A SarkarRegulatory Affairs, Center for Research & Technology, Altria Client Services LLC, 601 East Jackson Street, Richmond, VA 23219, USA. Mohamadi.A.Sarkar@altria.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Computational models are valuable tools for predicting the population effects prior to Food and Drug Administration (FDA) authorization of a modified risk claim on a tobacco product. We have developed and validated a population model using best modeling practices. Our model consists of a Markov compartmental model based on cohorts starting at a defined age and followed up to a specific age accounting for 29 tobacco-use states based on a cohort members transition pathway. The Markov model is coupled with statistical mortality models and excess relative risk ratio estimates to determine survival probabilities from use of smokeless tobacco. Our model estimates the difference in premature deaths prevented by comparing Base Case ("world-as-is") and Modified Case (the most likely outcome given that a modified risk claim is authorized) scenarios. Nationally representative transition probabilities were used for the Base Case. Probabilities of key transitions for the Modified Case were estimated based on a behavioral intentions study in users and nonusers. Our model predicts an estimated 93,000 premature deaths would be avoided over a 60-year period upon authorization of a modified risk claim. Our sensitivity analyses using various reasonable ranges of input parameters do not indicate any scenario under which the net benefit could be offset entirely.

Indexed as

RiskAdultAgedAge FactorsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedModels, StatisticalOdds RatioPopulation HealthTobacco, SmokelessTobacco UseUnited StatesUnited States Food and Drug Administrationmodified risk tobacco product applicationmodified risk tobacco productspopulation level impactpopulation modelingsmokeless tobaccotobacco harm reduction

Identifiers

PMID30970571
PMCPMC6479389

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.