Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30970113›Full record

Trial reportJournal of applied oral science : revista FOB2019

A new technique for tongue brushing and halitosis reduction: the X technique.

Ana Carolina de Souza Gonçalves, Marisol Corvino Nogueira Martins, Bruna Luísa de Paula, Paulo Henrique Weckwerth, Solange de Oliveira Braga Franzolin, Elcia Maria Varize Silveira

Open access · diamondAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of applied oral science : revista FOB, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ana Carolina de Souza GonçalvesUniversidade do Sagrado Coração, Bauru, São Paulo, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5581-412X
Marisol Corvino Nogueira MartinsUniversidade do Sagrado Coração, Bauru, São Paulo, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2685-8289
Bruna Luísa de PaulaUniversidade do Sagrado Coração, Bauru, São Paulo, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1968-7661
Paulo Henrique WeckwerthUniversidade do Sagrado Coração, Bauru, São Paulo, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4798-8162
Solange de Oliveira Braga FranzolinUniversidade do Sagrado Coração, Bauru, São Paulo, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6396-2886
Elcia Maria Varize SilveiraUniversidade do Sagrado Coração, Bauru, São Paulo, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4730-0583
Universidade Sagrado Coração · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The tongue is one of the primary sources of halitosis. The manual or mechanical removal of biofilm is known to decrease oral malodor.

objectiveTo evaluate a new tongue hygiene technique hereby referred to as "the X technique" and its effects on both halitosis and the number of microorganisms based on microbiological parameters and diagnostic features of the breath. MATERIAL AND

methodsThe study included thirty patients divided into a control group (patients without systematized guidelines of lingual hygiene, but who performed the mechanical cleaning of tongue dorsum, each in its own way), the 3R group (instructed to perform the movements of the X technique for 3 repetitions at each brushing), and the 6R group (instructed to perform 6 repetitions of the technique at each brushing). After two weeks, a new data collection was performed.

resultsPatients in the 6R group presented the lowest score on the organoleptic assessment scale at the second consultation, followed by the 3R group and the controls. Regarding the self-perception of breath by the method of Visual Analog Scale (VAS), the control group did not perceive improvements in oral malodor; the results of the 3R group and the 6R group were similar.

conclusionThese results indicate that the X technique improves both measurements and perceptions of halitosis. Microbiological analyses revealed greatest reduction in the 6R group. The findings show that the X technique reduces both organoleptic scores and the number of bacterial colonies, and improves users' perceptions of their breath.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAnalysis of VarianceBiofilmsDiagnostic Self EvaluationFemaleHalitosisHumansMaleMiddle AgedOral HygieneStatistics, NonparametricTongueToothbrushingTreatment OutcomeVisual Analog Scale

Identifiers

PMID30970113
PMCPMC6442830
OpenAlexW2931691773

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.