Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30970012›Full record

ArticlePloS one2019

Structural and catalytic insights into HoLaMa, a derivative of Klenow DNA polymerase lacking the proofreading domain.

Michael Kovermann, Alessandra Stefan, Anna Castaldo, Sara Caramia, Alejandro Hochkoeppler

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. DNA polymerase I: structure, activity, and function in bacterial DNA replication and repair.Critical reviews in biochemistry and molecular biology · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Michael KovermannDepartment of Chemistry, University of Konstanz, Universitätstraße, Konstanz, Germany.
Alessandra StefanDepartment of Pharmacy and Biotechnology, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Anna CastaldoDepartment of Pharmacy and Biotechnology, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Sara CaramiaDepartment of Pharmacy and Biotechnology, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Alejandro HochkoepplerDepartment of Pharmacy and Biotechnology, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5144-2154

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We report here on the stability and catalytic properties of the HoLaMa DNA polymerase, a Klenow sub-fragment lacking the 3'-5' exonuclease domain. HoLaMa was overexpressed in Escherichia coli, and the enzyme was purified by means of standard chromatographic techniques. High-resolution NMR experiments revealed that HoLaMa is properly folded at pH 8.0 and 20°C. In addition, urea induced a cooperative folding to unfolding transition of HoLaMa, possessing an overall thermodynamic stability and a transition midpoint featuring ΔG and CM equal to (15.7 ± 1.9) kJ/mol and (3.5 ± 0.6) M, respectively. When the catalytic performances of HoLaMa were compared to those featured by the Klenow enzyme, we did observe a 10-fold lower catalytic efficiency by the HoLaMa enzyme. Surprisingly, HoLaMa and Klenow DNA polymerases possess markedly different sensitivities in competitive inhibition assays performed to test the effect of single dNTPs.

Indexed as

Amino Acid SubstitutionCatalytic DomainDNA Polymerase IEnzyme StabilityEscherichia coliEscherichia coli ProteinsKineticsMutagenesis, Site-DirectedNuclear Magnetic Resonance, BiomolecularPeptide FragmentsProtein DomainsProtein FoldingRecombinant ProteinsSubstrate SpecificityThermodynamicsDNA Polymerase IEscherichia coli ProteinsPeptide FragmentsRecombinant Proteins

Identifiers

PMID30970012
PMCPMC6457538

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.