Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30970001›Full record

ArticlePloS one2019

Premedication practices for delivery room intubations in premature infants in France: Results from the EPIPAGE 2 cohort study.

Elizabeth Walter-Nicolet, Emilie Courtois, Christophe Milesi, Pierre-Yves Ancel, Alain Beuchée, Pierre Tourneux, Valérie Benhammou, Ricardo Carbajal, Xavier Durrmeyer

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Midazolam for sedation of infants in the neonatal intensive care unit.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Review
  4. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Elizabeth Walter-NicoletMedicine and Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, Saint Joseph Hospital, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0002-5055-5501
Emilie CourtoisPaediatric Emergency Department. Trousseau Hospital, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France.
Christophe MilesiPaediatric and Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, University Hospital Arnaud de Villeneuve, Montpellier, France.
Pierre-Yves AncelINSERM, U1153, Epidemiology and Statistics Sorbonne Paris Cité Research Center, Obstetrical, Perinatal and Pediatric Epidemiology Team, Paris, France.
Alain BeuchéeDivision of Neonatology and CIC-1414, Department of Pediatrics, University Hospital, Rennes, France.
Pierre TourneuxNeonatal and Paediatric Intensive Care Unit, University hospital, Amiens, France.ORCID 0000-0001-8069-4863
Valérie BenhammouINSERM, U1153, Epidemiology and Statistics Sorbonne Paris Cité Research Center, Obstetrical, Perinatal and Pediatric Epidemiology Team, Paris, France.
Ricardo CarbajalPaediatric Emergency Department. Trousseau Hospital, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France.
Xavier DurrmeyerINSERM, U1153, Epidemiology and Statistics Sorbonne Paris Cité Research Center, Obstetrical, Perinatal and Pediatric Epidemiology Team, Paris, France.
Délégation Paris 5 · FRInserm · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Amiens-Picardie · FRHôpital Arnaud de Villeneuve · FRSorbonne Université · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo assess premedication practices before tracheal intubation of premature newborns in the delivery room (DR). STUDY

designFrom the national population-based prospective EPIPAGE 2 cohort in 2011, we extracted all live born preterms intubated in the DR in level-3 centers, without subsequent circulatory resuscitation. Studied outcomes included the rate and type of premedication, infants' and maternities' characteristics and survival and major neonatal morbidities at discharge from hospital. Univariate and multivariate analysis were performed and a generalized estimating equation was used to identify factors associated with premedication use.

resultsOut of 1494 included neonates born in 65 maternities, 76 (5.1%) received a premedication. Midazolam was the most used drug accounting for 49% of the nine drugs regimens observed. Premedicated, as compared to non premedicated neonates, had a higher median [IQR] gestational age (30 [28-31] vs 28 [27-30] weeks, p<10-3), median birth weight (1391 [1037-1767] vs 1074 [840-1440] g, p<10-3) and median 1-minute Apgar score (8 [6-9] vs 6 [3-8], p<10-3). Using univariate analyses, premedication was significantly less frequent after maternal general anesthesia and during nighttime and survival without major morbidity was significantly higher among premedicated neonates (56/73 (81.4%) vs 870/1341 (69.3%), p = 0.028). Only 10 centers used premedication at least once and had characteristics comparable to the 55 other centers. In these 10 centers, premedication rates varied from 2% to 75%, and multivariate analysis identified gestational age and 1-minute Apgar score as independent factors associated with premedication use.

conclusionPremedication rate before tracheal intubation was only 5.1% in the DR of level-3 maternities for premature neonates below 34 weeks of gestation in France in 2011 and seemed to be mainly associated with centers' local policies.

Indexed as

Birth WeightCohort StudiesDelivery RoomsFemaleFranceGestational AgeHumansInfant, NewbornInfant, Premature, DiseasesIntubation, IntratrachealMaleMidazolamMorbidityPregnancyPremedicationRetrospective StudiesMidazolam

Identifiers

PMID30970001
PMCPMC6457540
OpenAlexW2940035690

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.