Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30969799›Full record

ArticleJCO clinical cancer informatics2019

Mathematical Approach to Differentiate Spontaneous and Induced Evolution to Drug Resistance During Cancer Treatment.

James M Greene, Jana L Gevertz, Eduardo D Sontag

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JCO clinical cancer informatics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. 75 Years of Mathematical Oncology.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Threshold-awareness in adaptive cancer therapy.PLoS computational biology · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. NETISCE: a network-based tool for cell fate reprogramming.NPJ systems biology and applications · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. A theoretical analysis of tumour containment.Nature ecology & evolution · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

James M GreeneRutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ.
Jana L GevertzThe College of New Jersey, Ewing Township, NJ.
Eduardo D SontagNortheastern University, Boston, MA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeDrug resistance is a major impediment to the success of cancer treatment. Resistance is typically thought to arise from random genetic mutations, after which mutated cells expand via Darwinian selection. However, recent experimental evidence suggests that progression to drug resistance need not occur randomly, but instead may be induced by the treatment itself via either genetic changes or epigenetic alterations. This relatively novel notion of resistance complicates the already challenging task of designing effective treatment protocols. MATERIALS AND

methodsTo better understand resistance, we have developed a mathematical modeling framework that incorporates both spontaneous and drug-induced resistance.

resultsOur model demonstrates that the ability of a drug to induce resistance can result in qualitatively different responses to the same drug dose and delivery schedule. We have also proven that the induction parameter in our model is theoretically identifiable and propose an in vitro protocol that could be used to determine a treatment's propensity to induce resistance.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularModels, TheoreticalMutationAlgorithmsAntineoplastic AgentsDrug Resistance, NeoplasmHumansNeoplasmsAntineoplastic Agents

Identifiers

PMID30969799
PMCPMC6873992

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.