Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30969354›Full record

ReviewHerzschrittmachertherapie & Elektrophysiologie2019

[Cardiac implantable electronic devices and health-related quality of life].

Salma HajKheder, Anja Haase-Fielitz, Christian Butter

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Herzschrittmachertherapie & Elektrophysiologie, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Salma HajKhederAbteilung für Kardiologie, Immanuel Klinikum Bernau Herzzentrum Brandenburg, Hochschulklinikum der Medizinischen Hochschule Brandenburg (MHB) Theodor Fontane, Ladeburger Str. 17, 16321, Bernau bei Berlin, Deutschland.
Anja Haase-FielitzAbteilung für Kardiologie, Immanuel Klinikum Bernau Herzzentrum Brandenburg, Hochschulklinikum der Medizinischen Hochschule Brandenburg (MHB) Theodor Fontane, Ladeburger Str. 17, 16321, Bernau bei Berlin, Deutschland. a.haase-fielitz@immanuel.de.
Christian ButterAbteilung für Kardiologie, Immanuel Klinikum Bernau Herzzentrum Brandenburg, Hochschulklinikum der Medizinischen Hochschule Brandenburg (MHB) Theodor Fontane, Ladeburger Str. 17, 16321, Bernau bei Berlin, Deutschland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Patients, scientists and healthcare providers are increasingly interested in identifying interventions that not only reduce mortality but also improve symptoms, function and health-related quality of life. Health-related quality of life is a strong, independent predictor of mortality, cardiovascular events, hospitalization and treatment costs in patients with cardiac diseases. Remote monitoring of pacemakers has a positive effect on health-related quality of life and functional capacity and is equivalent to monitoring these patients in hospitals. Implantation of an implantable cardioverter defibrillator has a major impact on mental health, with the majority of patients experiencing the fear of ICD shocks as particularly detrimental to the quality of life. Variables, such as age, gender and duration of implantation should be considered in the assessment and planning of strategies for improving the quality of life of patients with electronic implantable cardiac devices.

Indexed as

Defibrillators, ImplantableHeart DiseasesPacemaker, ArtificialCardiac Resynchronization Therapy DevicesHumansQuality of LifeCardiac resynchronization therapyHeart insufficiencyImplantable cardioverter defibrillatorLeft ventricular assist systemPacemaker, artificial

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.