Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30969348›Full record

ReviewPsychopharmacology2019

Scheduling synthetic cathinone substances under the Controlled Substances Act.

Katherine R Bonson, Tyler Dalton, Dominic Chiapperino

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Psychopharmacology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Safety and cognitive pharmacodynamics following dose escalations with 3-methylmethcathinone (3-MMC): a first in human, designer drug study.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2025
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Interpol Review of Drug Analysis 2019-2022.Forensic science international. Synergy · 2023
    Review
  7. Article
  8. An updated review on synthetic cathinones.Archives of toxicology · 2021
    Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Katherine R BonsonControlled Substance Staff, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD, 20910, USA. katherine.bonson@fda.hhs.gov.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6821-7562
Tyler DaltonControlled Substance Staff, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD, 20910, USA.
Dominic ChiapperinoControlled Substance Staff, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD, 20910, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and rationaleCathinones are amphetamine analogues that produce stimulant effects with rewarding properties. For many decades, synthetic cathinones have been used in the United States (USA) for abuse purposes, leading to concern about public safety by the federal government. Under the Controlled Substances Act (CSA), the federal government may place drugs with high abuse potential but no currently accepted medical use into Schedule I of the CSA. The process of scheduling an abusable drug involves both the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), through the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA), and the Department of Justice, through the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA).

resultsThis paper details how numerous synthetic cathinones were placed under CSA control between 1973 and 2018, with an emphasis on 10 cathinones that were placed into Schedule I in 2017 (butylone, naphyrone, pentylone, pentedrone, 3-fluoro-N-methylcathinone (FMC), 4-FMC, 4-methyl-N-ethylcathinone, 4-methyl-pyrrolidinopropiophenone, alpha-pyrrolidinobutiophenone, and α-pyrrolidinopentiophenone). A summary is provided of the scientific and medical analysis performed by HHS, in the form of an Eight-Factor Analysis (8FA), as prescribed by the CSA. This 8FA was then evaluated and signed by the Assistant Secretary for Health at HHS and transmitted to DEA, which permanently placed the 10 cathinones into Schedule I after public notices were published into the Federal Register. DISCUSSION AND

conclusionsUnderstanding the scientific data, analysis, and complex process utilized by the US federal government in the CSA scheduling of cathinones with abuse potential and no accepted medical use is important for transparency in governmental decision-making.

Indexed as

AlkaloidsCentral Nervous System StimulantsControlled SubstancesHumansPentanonesPrescription Drug DiversionPyrrolidinesSynthetic DrugsUnited StatesUnited States Food and Drug Administration1-phenyl-2-(1-pyrrolidinyl)-1-pentanoneAlkaloidscathinoneCentral Nervous System StimulantsControlled SubstancesPentanonesPyrrolidinesSynthetic DrugsAbuseCathinoneControlled Substances Act (CSA)Department of Health and Human Services (HHS)Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA)Food and Drug Administration (FDA)Psychotropic conventionRegulationScheduling

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.